1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
navik [9.2K]
3 years ago
9

Would you regard the manner in which USSR took control of the Eastern European countries as justified?

History
1 answer:
just olya [345]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Yes. I would.

What I could say regarding the manner in which the USSR took control of the Eastern European countries is that it was not justified, but understandable.

It was not justified because no country has the right to intervene or take possession of another country. Not in modern times. Understandable because Soviet leader, General Joseph Stalin, considered these countries as a buffer zone in the case western European countries decided or tried to invade the Soviet Union.

That is why the USSSR took control of countries such as Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, West Germany, and Bulgaria.

You might be interested in
Witch of the following would NOT be a characteristic of a nation-state?
Dafna1 [17]
D) numerous village kings
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Need for a Constitution
seraphim [82]

Answer:

weak central government.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
compare and contrast each of these 3 rebel fighters jose marti, emilio aguinaldo, and francinso "pancho" villa explain the backg
Lilit [14]
They all battled for their opportunity. Trusted that they ought to have the capacity to be free. They simply all did it extraordinary and in various parts of the world. Martí needed to free Cuban's. He was a Cuban nationalist. He battled for autonomy and made war, for opportunity. Emilio was a Philippian patriot. He needed his opportunity. He enables the Americans in the Spanish-American to war. He helped Americans battle against Spanish so he could be free from Spanish. Manor was a renegade pioneer and help the Mexico. Be that as it may, got pursues for some time until the point that the general surrendered and left.
8 0
4 years ago
How did Britain’s war with France influence the movement of the United States toward war
antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

It convinced the British that the Americans weren't worth fighting against anymore.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What did leaders of Rhode Island believe would happen to religiou if church and state were connected ?
skelet666 [1.2K]
The leaders of rhode island believed that religion would become corrupted.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Andrew Carnegie would most likely agree with which of the following statements?
    12·2 answers
  • Which was a direct result of the transatlantic slave trade?
    6·2 answers
  • The Berlin Wall also called the
    14·2 answers
  • How would you describe bias and how would you say that bias affects your life?
    12·1 answer
  • Compare and Contrast Thomas Hobbes and John Locke's ideas of Social Contract
    5·1 answer
  • During world war 2 mexican workers came to the united States as part of the​
    15·2 answers
  • Help meeee i seriously neeed heelp
    12·1 answer
  • Part A
    6·1 answer
  • How did Washington's Farewell Address influence political parties?
    11·1 answer
  • What did slaves sometimes follow when they started out on their journey north?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!