1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
navik [9.2K]
3 years ago
9

Would you regard the manner in which USSR took control of the Eastern European countries as justified?

History
1 answer:
just olya [345]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Yes. I would.

What I could say regarding the manner in which the USSR took control of the Eastern European countries is that it was not justified, but understandable.

It was not justified because no country has the right to intervene or take possession of another country. Not in modern times. Understandable because Soviet leader, General Joseph Stalin, considered these countries as a buffer zone in the case western European countries decided or tried to invade the Soviet Union.

That is why the USSSR took control of countries such as Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, West Germany, and Bulgaria.

You might be interested in
Why did Hitler launch operation Barbarossa?
Digiron [165]
Fun fact Hitler was an artist he wasn’t that bad honestly this boy was fresh with it but then they rejected him and then he became a killer cosas sad
4 0
3 years ago
Why did truman dislike stalin
harina [27]
Truman disliked stalin because of political differences the usa were capitalist and the ussr were communist another reason was tat he didnt  like the fact that stalin was a dictator who would murder millions of people 
8 0
3 years ago
The period of dual federalism (1865 - 1937) was marked by?
Valentin [98]
Business supremacy in the area of commerce 
3 0
3 years ago
Where am I??????? I am escared bro
34kurt
Your on brainy the site created for students by students


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please type down your thoughts
8_murik_8 [283]

Answer:

1. Basically restricting and public Religious hearings, (going to the Mosc, Church etc. is fine)

2. There has been so much hate and problems going on because of religion. They think whatever religious stuff is going on should be in a place with people that actually believe in the religion, rather than brainwashing people with other religions.

3. They do not over present their religion and/or try and force it on people. Also, a lot of people mind their own business outside of the US, (I'm guessing that's where your answering this bc I am too) so they do not say anything.

Explanation:

hope this helps and plz mark brainliest!

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did more European countries begin to explore the world as time went on
    13·1 answer
  • What acts/laws did King George III repeal?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes the Battle of Midway?
    15·2 answers
  • Why was the election of 1860 known as the final straw leading to the civil war
    11·1 answer
  • Read and summarize (write) in your own words this textbook passage about<br> Sharecropping:
    13·1 answer
  • Fifteen-minute family dramas called soap operas aired on weekdays on the radio in the 1930s. Why were these dramas called soap o
    10·1 answer
  • Why did US imperialists want to acquire the Philippines
    12·1 answer
  • Who invented the cycle?​
    9·1 answer
  • Which is one of the defining characteristics of the modern era ?
    14·2 answers
  • Help lol hurry I don’t understand
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!