Answer:
<u>Physical flow schedule</u>
Inputs
Beginning Work in Process 86,300
Add Units Started 105,900
Total 192,200
Outputs
Units Completed and Transferred 172,900
Units in Ending Work in Process 19,300
Total 192,200
Explanation:
A physical flow schedule is simply a schedule of units introduced into the process and units outputs without expressing them to equivalent units.
Units Introduced must always be equal to units outputs in physicals terms.
<em>Units Completed and Transferred = Beginning Inventory + Units Started - Units in Ending Work in Process</em>
= 86,300 + 105,900 - 19,300
= 172,900
The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
It can be said that kent and julie have Low Inter-rater Reliability.
<h3>
What is Inter-rater Reliability?</h3>
- Inter-rater reliability is a statistical metric used to assess the degree of consensus among various judges or raters.
- It is employed as a method of evaluating the accuracy of the responses generated by various test items.
- A test's lower inter-rater reliability may be a sign that its questions are obscure, difficult to understand, or even superfluous.
- The percentage of items that the judges agree on can be calculated as a straightforward technique to assess inter-rater reliability.
- This is referred to as percent agreement, and it always falls between 0 and 1, with 0 denoting complete disagreement among raters and 1 denoting perfect agreement.
To know more about Inter-rater Reliability with the given link
brainly.com/question/14316125
#SPJ4
Answer:
c. criterion deficiency
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario it seems that the performance management system suffers from Criterion deficiency. This term refers to a company failing to assess one or more very important aspects of the process of job performance appraisal for employees within the company. Such as is the case in this scenario as the company is only looking at the sales revenue and completely ignoring all of the other important factors.
