Western Europe... idk if that is one of the answer choices
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The human rights violation of human trafficking is the denial of human sacrosanct rights during trafficking situation which include the prevention of human rights in the areas such as the right to life, security, liberty, right to freedom of movement and thought, right to be free from torture or inhumane handling or punishment, all of which is what humans are legally and naturally have a right.
<span>they had more enduring personal resources, ranging from physical and intellectual resources to social and psychological resources.
Having positive emotions will help every individuals in changing their perspective into a more positive outlook.
This will not only affect their mood throughout the day, but it make them much more likely to find a suitable solution when they're facing a problem in their life.</span>
I think it would be B because the laws are laws whether the president likes them or not.
When a plaintiff has both federal and state-based claims against a defendant and diversity jurisdiction does not exist, the federal court has <span>Discretion to exercise supplemental (pendent) Jurisdiction over the state law claim if the two claims derive from a common nucleus of operative fact and are such that a plaintiff would ordinarily be expected to try them all in one judicial proceeding</span>
