1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
Answer:
unenforceable;
preexisting duty
Explanation:
Preexisting Duty Doctrine
This is simply regarded as when an individual is already under an obligation to do something. It simply states that the rules and guidelines under contract law that shows that if a party to a contract is under a pre-existing duty to perform, then no second thought (consideration) is taken for the modification of the contract. Modification is then voidable.
3 Types of Legal Duties
1. Public Legal Duties such ad the duty of a police officer to protect lives and properties.
2. Contractual Legal Duties such as unperformed, preexisting contractual promises etc.
3. Private Legal Duties such as the duty to follow the law.
Unenforceable Contracts
This is regarded as a contract that cannot be enforced/given consideration or effect by the court of law etc unless they are settled and corrected according to law.
Kinds of unenforceable contracts
1.) Those entered into in the name of another by one without, or acting in excess of rights or authority;
2.) Those that do not comply with the Statute of Frauds etc.
<span>Which best describes the role of financial planning? Allow someone to have fewer economic obstacles. A financial plan is important to have because it allows someone to be best set up for the future. A financial plan allows you to predict your future cash flows, asset values and save for unfortunate events. Those who actively participate in financial planning tend to overcome the fewer economic obstacles thrown their way. </span>
I really don't understand what you are asking
An appraised price is an evaluation of a property's fee-based totally on a given factor in time.
An appraised cost is an evaluation of a property's value based totally on a given factor in time. The evaluation is accomplished by means of a professional appraiser for the duration of the mortgage origination technique. The appraiser is normally selected by way of the lender but the appraisal is paid for by way of the borrower.
Actual property professional opinion is typically towards the idea of paying extra than a property's appraised price. Even if you make up the difference on below-appraised assets, you may have assets well worth much less than what you paid.
If buyers are few and far among whilst you list your house, there may be a hazard the marketplace cost may be lower than the appraised price. then again, in case you're seeing a ton of interest in your own home from a couple of consumers, you could discover that the marketplace value is better than the appraisal value.
Learn more about appraised value here: brainly.com/question/26080329
#SPJ4
