1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ratling [72]
3 years ago
14

HELPPP PLEASE SO MUCH

Mathematics
1 answer:
Dmitry [639]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Help

Step-by-step explanation:

Help

You might be interested in
Mrs. Watson has 30 desks in her math class, each shaped like the trapezoid shown below. She plans to cover each one with bulleti
adoni [48]

Answer: 12,888 in^2 (inches squared)

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Based on a random sample of 25 units of product X, the average weight is 102 lbs., and the sample standard deviation is 10 lbs.
Alex

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that for a sample size of 25, sample mean = 102 lbs. and sample std deviation = 10 lbs.

H_0: \bar x = 100\\H_a: \bar x >100

(Right tailed test)

Given that we assume population is normally distributed

Test statistic:

Mean difference = +2

Std error of sample = \frac{10}{\sqrt{25} } =2

t = test statistic = Mean diff/Std error = 1

degree of freedom= n-1 =24

Critical value of t = 1.711

Our test statistic >1.71

Accept alternate hypothesis

Because there is significant difference between the test statistic and test statistic lies above critical value.

3 0
3 years ago
Does anyone know how to do this? pls help
valkas [14]

Answer:

-3

Step-by-step explanation:

If you reflect over the y-axis and then move 2 units to the left(x-2), then ABCD will be 3 units above EHGF. Since you need to move it down 3 units to map ABCD onto EHGF, you will need to do y-3, which is the same as y+-3

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Salk polio vaccine experiment in 1954 focused on the effectiveness of the vaccine in combating paralytic polio. Because it w
sdas [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The variables of interest are:

X₁: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the placebo vaccine.

n₁= 201299 total children studied

x₁= 110 cases observed

X₂: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the experimental vaccine.

n₂= 200745 total children studied

x₂= 33 cases observed

These two variables have a binomial distribution. The parameters of interest, the ones to compare, are the population proportions: p₁ vs p₂

You have to test if the population proportions of children who contracted polio in both groups are different: p₂ ≠ p₁

a)

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.05

Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }

Sample proportion placebo p'₁= x₁/n₁= 110/201299= 0.0005

Sample proportion vaccine p'₂= x₂/n₂= 33/200745= 0.0002

Pooled sample proportion p'= (x₁+x₂)/(n₁+n₂)= (110+33)/(201299+200745)= 0.0004

Z_{H_0}= \frac{(0.0002-0.0005)-0}{\sqrt{0.0004[\frac{1}{201299} +\frac{1}{200745} ]} }= -4.76

This test is two-tailed, using the critical value approach, you have to determine two critical values:

Z_{\alpha/2}= Z_{0.025}= -1.96

Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.975}= 1.96

Then if Z_{H_0} ≤ -1.96 or if Z_{H_0} ≥ 1.96, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -1.96 < Z_{H_0} < 1.96, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ Z_{H_0}= -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

b)

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.01

Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }

The value of Z_{H_0}= -4.76 doesn't change, since we are working with the same samples.

The only thing that changes alongside with the level of significance is the rejection region:

Z_{\alpha /2}= Z_{0.005}= -2.576

Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.995}= 2.576

Then if Z_{H_0} ≤ -2.576or if Z_{H_0} ≥ 2.576, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -2.576< Z_{H_0} < 2.576, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ Z_{H_0}= -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

c)

Remember the level of significance (probability of committing type I error) is the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis. This means that the smaller this value is, the fewer chances you have of discarding the true null hypothesis. But as you know, you cannot just reduce this value to zero because, the smaller α is, the bigger β (probability of committing type II error) becomes.

Rejecting the null hypothesis using different values of α means that there is a high chance that you reached a correct decision (rejecting a false null hypothesis)

I hope this helps!

8 0
4 years ago
For this question you must Answer A B and C
Dimas [21]

Answer: Idk but try downloading more apps it’s a lot easier to have more than one

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Need help solving this :/
    10·1 answer
  • Scientists have created a 10-nanometer transistor for use in computers. A nanometer is 10 to the power of -9. What is the length
    11·1 answer
  • A measure of ________ for a numerical data set describes how its values vary with a single number.
    13·2 answers
  • The diffrence between 7 and x is 23
    14·2 answers
  • How much does she practice during this season
    10·2 answers
  • What is estimate for 10.39-4.28
    8·2 answers
  • Help! Worth 15! AND MARK BRAINLIEST
    9·1 answer
  • If the second term in a geometric sequence is 3 and the 9th term is 839 808,
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME!! I’ll give brainliest!!
    5·2 answers
  • Which expression is equivalent to (1−sinβ)(1+sinβ)/cos2β for all values of β for which (1−sinβ)(1+sinβ)/cos2β is defined?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!