5 + 2 + 4 + 31.5 = 42.5 units^(2)
The information given about the proof does that Daniel made an error on line 2.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
Given:
1. AB = 3x +2; BC = 4x + 8; AC = 38
2. AB + BC = AC incorrect (not an angle angle addition postulate)
3. 3x+2 + 4x + 8 = 38 correct
4. 7x + 10 = 38 correct
5. 7x = 28 correct
6. x = 4
Daniel made an error on line 2.
Here is the complete question:
Daniel wrote the following two-column proof for the given information. Given: AB = 3x + 2; BC = 4x + 8; AC = 38 Prove: x = 4 Statements Reason 1. AB = 3x + 2; BC = 4x + 8; AC = 38 1. Given 2. AB + BC = AC 2. Angle Addition Postulate 3. 3x + 2 + 4x + 8 = 38 3. Substitution Property of Equality 4. 7x + 10 = 38 4. Combining Like Terms 5. 7x = 28 5. Subtraction Property of Equality 6. x = 4 6. Division Property of Equality On which line, did Daniel make his error? line 2 line 3 line 4 line 5
Learn more about proof on:
brainly.com/question/4134755
#SPJ1
Answer:
Ok, the rules of the exponent come from a logic construction.
If we have x^n
this means that n is multiplied by itself n times.
If we decompose n into a + b, we have:
x by itself a times, and then x by itself b times, and for how the product works, this is equivalent:
if n = 5, a= 2 and b = 3
x^5 = (x*x*x*x*x) 5 times-
x^5 = x^(2 + 3) = (x^2)*(x^3) = (x*x*)*(x*x*x) = x*x*x*x*x = x^5
And the same for the other rules:
(x^n)^b = x^n*b and such.
Obviusly, this only works when we have a common base.
So the correct answer is that we constructed the exponential rules in a way that only can be used when we have a common base, and this happens because to construct them, we started with common bases.
Substitute the value of the variable into the expression and simplify 37
Answer:
7 children
Step-by-step explanation:
14) Number of children = Cost of the oven ÷ amount paid by each child
= 149.45 ÷ 21.35
= 7
