well, I guess it depends on what are you talking about.
are you referring to the impact that doing what you like with passion can affect other people's perspectives?
then you can say something like
"therefore, the passion shown by a person can affect or impact their perspectives, and even their motivation to achieve certain goals."
I think that this is a very hard question to answer. I think that many kings, fictional or not, possess both the bad and good traits of being a king.
In regards to Macbeth, he certainly possessed the ambition many would wish for a king. He was brave, as noted by Duncan and the title of the Thane of Cawdor. He was protective, as noted by his murder of Banquo. Macbeth was even proud, as seen by his desire to keep the new title of Thane before taking the crown.
Unfortunately, many of the characteristics one would align with being a good king made Macbeth a bad king as well. Macbeth was too ambitious--as seen by his murdering Duncan. He was too protective--as seen by his inability to interpret the apparitions warnings in the correct way. Lastly, he was too proud--as seen by his refusal to leave the castle as Birnam Wood "moved" against him.
Like anything, one must always have control. Too much of anything normally turns out to be a bad thing. Therefore, depending upon one's individual views, Macbeth could be both a bad king or a good one.
BTW: It's free real estate.
At first, lovesick and infatuated with Rosaline but after he'd met Juliet hopelessly in love
<span>The answer is B and D. Overpopulation is among the most squeezing ecological issues, noiselessly exasperating the strengths behind an unnatural weather change, ecological contamination, living space misfortune, the 6th mass termination, escalated cultivating rehearses and the utilization of limited normal assets, for example, freshwater, arable land and non-renewable energy sources</span>
