What might happen between the British and the Indians in the future.

History

1 answer:

goblinko [34]3 years ago

4 0

ANSWER:

As India celebrates 70 years of independence from the British, there is an alternative lens to view the history of the two nations. A history not solely defined by the Raj, but one that evolved during a period in the mid-eighteenth century before British rule became entrenched. I’d go so far to argue that to fully understand 1947, you have to understand how the British entered India in the 1770s.

Explanation:

Back then, when the future wasn't yet written, there was still a possibility of exchange between cultures. This exchange would not be available when racial stratification and ‘us’ versus ‘them’ polarities became the norm. It was a time of acceptance and rejection, when class, rather than skin colour was often the over-riding factor of difference.

You might be interested in

Who controlled the trade and investment within a sphere of influence in China?

AnnyKZ [126]

China’s growing global role and increasingly hardline policies at home and abroad gain attention, the United States and other Western governments are also taking notice of China’s expanding influence in developing countries. The implications of China’s growing investments linked to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), its ambitious global infrastructure and connectivity program, are increasingly debated. So, too, are the nature of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) efforts to popularize its authoritarian model and undermine developing democracies around the world, whether intentionally or indirectly.1 In November, Vice President Pence noted that the administration, through its Indo-Pacific strategy, intends to bolster the rule of law and human rights in regional countries facing growing influence from China.

hope this help... :)

4 0

2 years ago

Hich description best summarizes why the feudal system benefited all its members?

JulsSmile [24]

B. interdependence hope this helps xx

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A paragraph about all about UC San Diego

Strike441 [17]

Answer:

it a really hard school to get in

5 0

3 years ago

Who do you think is primarily to blame for starting the Cold War?

Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

Gavrilo Princip

Explanation:

Princip was the Serbian who assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand, which sparked World War I. Following World War I, Russia weakened as it cannot take on providing a second front for the Allies as well as fighting a civil war. Russia lost against the communist forces, which led to the Communist rise to power, effectively eliminating Russia from World War I. Enter in the U.S.S.R, which then made dealings with Germany, in which they were able to take satellite countries for themselves in Europe. They then joined the Allied side & helped defeat the Axis, which in turn granted them territories, which helped expand their sphere of influence. As the Market Economy & Command Economy are on the opposite spectrum, and with the arms build up, the world entered into the Cold War.

Without Princip assassinating Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife, none of this may have happened.

4 0

3 years ago

Nancy is a writer for a well-known city newspaper. She is writing an article about one of the Congressional candidates. Having a

V125BC [204]

Press

press is the right to talk freely and put out information about the government without punishment. but, nancy is putting out fake information

6 0

2 years ago