I believe the answer is: <span>person-situation controversy
</span><span>person-situation controversy refers to a debate in the field of psychology which argue whether a person or the situation play a more crucial factor in determining a person's behavior.
</span>
Experts who support the 'person' side in this controversy believed that people with bad personality traits would always do bad behaviors regardless the situation they're in.
Experts who support the 'situation' side in this controversy believed that bad behaviors only occurs because the people are facing bad situations in their life.
True
According to Abraham Maslow, a psychologist, humans are inclined towards safety needs as one among several psychological needs. After the need for food and water, safety needs involve the aspirations of a certain future. Humans tend to avoid any situation that may cause them pain and uncertainty. When the safety need is not met, a negative emotional state is induced.
For Reps it means that they always have to vote with thier consituants, or risk being voted out in 2 years.
For senators, they only have to worry during the last 2 years when the issues are still fresh in the media, so not so much for them
The Latin American revolutions from 1804 to 1821 were
unsuccessful and left strong conservative governments in place.
During the time following the French Revolution in Europe, revolutions began to take place across Latin America. Napoleon came to power in France, and he extended his regime to Portugal and Spain (and elsewhere). Napoleon's focus was on seizing control in Europe. Movements for independence spread across countries in Latin America that had been controlled by Spain and Portugal. But those movements didn't yield the ideals of liberty that the revolutionaries hoped for.
One of the famous freedom fighters in Latin America was Simón Bolivar. Bolivar reflected on the revolutions with a famous phrase: ""All who served the Revolution have plowed the sea." He was expressing his frustrations with how independence had led to situations where <em>caudillos</em> (authoritarian leaders) rose to power. Bolivar had wanted a united Spanish America, a great nations, but the wars of independence had tended to result in charismatic military rulers leading their own countries in authoritarian ways -- what we today would call dictators.
I think the second one and fouth one are correct but I could be totally wrong :/
