Answer:
Option D. Both A and B
Explanation:
The reason is that the investment that are readily convertible to cash are less risk and as a result the investors are compensated with lower returns and vice versa. So the only statement that is not false statement is option C and the statement A and B are False.
Answer:
Effect on income= $4,500 increase
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Special offer: 9,000 units of product S51 for $20.50 a unit.
Direct materials $ 3.10
Direct labor 1.50
Variable overhead 6.40
The customer would like modifications made to product S51 that would increase the variable costs by $5.00 per unit and that would require an investment of $36,000 in special molds that would have no salvage value.
<u>Because it is a special offer, we will not have into account the fixed costs.</u>
Unitary variable cost= 3.1 + 1.5 + 6.4 + 5= $16
Investment= 36,000
Effect on income= 9,000* (20.5 - 16) - 36,000
Effect on income= 40,500 - 36,000
Effect on income= $4,500 increase
The sub-treasury plan, the federal government would hold crops in public warehouses and issue loans on their value until they could be profitably sold.
<h3>Why did Farmers face an increasing debt load in the late 1800s?</h3>
They were caught between increased costs and falling prices.
<h3>
Why did the Grange movement focus on reducing prices that railroads and grain elevators charged? </h3>
Farmers relied on railroads and grain elevators but were forced to pay higher than usual rates.
<h3>
To learn more about sub-treasury system visit:</h3>
brainly.com/question/16824604
#SPJ4
Answer:
<u>Using the Harrod-Domar growth equation</u>
Growth rate = Saving rate / Capital output ratio
Growth rate = 0.01 / 3
Growth rate = 0.003
Growth rate = 0.3%
Thus, the value of growth rate is 0.3%
When the incremental capital-output ratio is 3, to achieve the 5% growth rate, the gross saving rate is 0.24 or 24%
Exogenous growth: When the labor supply is perfectly elastic, then the exogenous does not allow any factor to substitute
Endogenous growth: When the labor supply is perfectly elastic, theem the exogenous does not lead to address the savings decision or sources of productivity growth.
