All categories

3 years ago

Computing net income LO A1

1 answer:

5 0

Ummmm ... ok will not have any money and I can get a new phone I can do that and then you make me wanna play and I will go back on Monday if it’s a little bit of the above I

You might be interested in

Each of the scenarios considers a change in the aggregate price level. Please indicate whether the scenario demonstrates the wea

const2013 [10]

Answer:

1. Wealth Effect as the increase in the price level lead to fall in the purchasing power of money.

2. Interest rate effect . A higher price level induces an increase in the interest rate which results in reduction of borrowing for consumption and investment expenditures.

3. Interest rate effect

4. Wealth Effect- With the decrease in the price level, the purchasing power of the money will rise. Thus, he will be able to purchase same amount at less expenditure and also save the residual amount.

8 0

3 years ago

Multiple Choice Question 185 A patent a. is nonrenewable. b. is rarely subject to litigation because it is an exclusive right. c

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "A": is non-renewable.

Explanation:

A patent is a grant given to inventors over their creations so others cannot use, copy, either exploit the creation without the explicit permission of the inventor. Patents are non-renewable concessions that are usually provided for twenty (20) years, counted from the date when an application for the new invention is submitted to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

4 0

3 years ago

jennifer has the transactions below, what is the combined impact on her net worth when considering all of the transactions? She

slamgirl [31]

Answer:

1. No effect

2. Outflow of cash

3. No effect

So, by $6,000, the net worth would decrease.

Explanation:

1. In the first situation, she purchases $5,000 worth of a mutual fund with cash which means it affects both the asset and the liability. So, the net impact would be zero.

2. In the second situation, she spends $6,000 on a two-week vacation which means it withdrew money that represents an outflow of cash.

3. In the third situation, again it affects both the asset and the liability. So, the net impact would be zero.

So, the net worth would decrease by $6,000

4 0

3 years ago

A manufacturing firm has an annual demand of 300,000 units. Using its current operation, the firm pays $800,000 in annual fixed

Elodia [21]

Answer:

It is cheaper to make the units in-house by $300,000.-

Explanation:

First, we need to calculate the total avoidable production costs of making 300,000 units:

Total variable cost= 300,000*15= $4,500,000

Total avoidable fixed cost= 800,000 - 200,000= $600,000

Total production cost= $5,100,000

Now, the total differential cost of buying:

Cost of buying= 300,000*18= $5,400,000

It is cheaper to make the units in-house.

5 0

3 years ago

The volatility of the market portfolio is 10% and it has an expected return of 8%. The risk-free rate is 3%. calculate the beta

Maurinko [17]

Answer: 0.82466

Explanation:

You did not give the other information required to solve the question but here are some information that was gottten.

Portfolio Weight

HCE Corp = 0.25

Green Miget = 0.31

Alive and Well = 0.44

Volatility

HCE Corp = 10%

Green Miget = 27%

Alive and Well = 14%

Correlation with the Market Portfolio

HCE Corp = 0.43

Green Miget = 0.54

Alive and Well = 0.43

Beta of HCE Corp = (0.43 × 0.10)/0.10

= 0.43

Beta of Green Miget = (0.54 × 0.27)/0.10

= 1.458

Beta of Alive and Well

= (0.43 × 0.14 ) /0.10

= 0.602

The beta of the portfolio will then be calculated as the portfolio Weight multiplied by the beta of very stick and this will be

= (0.25 × 0.43) + (0.31 × 1.458) + (0.44 × 0.602)

= 0.1075 + 0.45198 + 0.26488

= 0.82436

3 0

3 years ago