The value of z is 17
w=24 , 24-7 is 17
If we assume that when producing 190 bicycles vs 170 bicycles the difference in total daily cost is purely attributed to the extra 20 bicycles, THEN the cost to produce 20 bicycles (190 - 170) = 11600 - 10900 = 700
So the cost per bicycle is 700/20 = 35/bike
Now we can subtract the cost of bicycle production to determine the daily fixed cost that is not related to the number of bicycles.
i.e. 170 bicycles x 35 = 5950
So on a day that RideEm produces 170 bicycles, subtract 5950 from total day cost of 10900, which equals 4950.
So the fixed daily costs are $4950, and on top of this, the company pays 35/bike to produce.
Answer:
The correct option is First. i.e <u>consistent.</u>
The System shown is <u>consistent.</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
Consistent:
A consistent system of equations is a system that has at least one solution.
Our System in graph has only and only ONE solution that is on X-axis
Where the lines are intersecting each other.
Hence, The System shown is <u>consistent.</u>
Inconsistent:
An inconsistent system of equations is a system that has no solution.
Equivalent:
Systems of equations that have the same solution are called equivalent systems. Given a system of two equations, we can produce an equivalent system by replacing one equation by the sum of the two equations, or by replacing an equation by a multiple of itself.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
H0 : μ ≥ 6
H1 : μ < 6
Test statistic :
n = 20
Sample Mean, x = 3
σ = 1.5
Test statistic = (x - μ) ÷ σ/sqrt(n)
Test statistic = (3 - 6) ÷ 1.5/sqrt(20)
Test statistic = - 3 / 0.3354101
Test statistic = −8.944271
Since, sample size is < 30 ;
Obtaining the Critical value using the from T;
Tcritical at 0.05, df = 19 = - 1.729
Tstatistic < Tcritical
−8.944271 < - 1.729
Hence, we reject the Null:
We can conclude that there is significant evidence that the number of complaints received by Lara music store is different from number of complaints received by music stores in general.
Answer: The answer is A.
Step-by-step explanation: The only valid conclusion that is listed in the options is choice A. The correct one is that the length of a person’s foot is a cause of their shoe size, which implies that there is also a correlation between the length of a person’s foot and their shoe size.
