1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Digiron [165]
2 years ago
11

Brainliest for correct answer

History
1 answer:
weqwewe [10]2 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is A. Jeremy

Explanation

The graph represents the speed at which Kevin walks with a speed of 23 miles every two hours, that is, in one hour Kevin travels 11.5 miles since he walks at a constant speed. On the other hand, Jeremy walks at a constant speed of 15 miles per hour, so Jeremy in two hours travels 30 miles. In four hours Jeremy travels 60 miles while Kevin travels 46 miles.

So the correct answer is A. Jeremy.

You might be interested in
What is the primary issue with a one party system?
Bad White [126]
The primary issue with a one party system is the suppression of individual rights and no democratic rights.


In a one-party system, like the one in Communist China, the people have no voice in how the country is run. One political party makes all the decision without any opposition in the parliament.

From the perspective of human rights, this will lead to dictatorship and a curb on freedom of speech.
4 0
3 years ago
What were the key elements that allowed the colonials to win the War for Independence? What people and events were important to
liberstina [14]

1. The alliance with France was really important because of the military power it gave to the United States, and not only that but it raised a lot of tension in other matters between the two European countries. Also the intervention of other nations like Spain and Netherlands turned the tide for the Americans a lot.

2. Military training and preparation is an element that can't be ignored, political issues were important but the performance on the battlefield was decisive for the outcome of the war, the war strategies and logistics were undoubtedly a key element in the victory of the colonials.

3. Political division in England as there was an internal conflict in the parliament as of the nature and future actions in the war.

4. The british alienated many potential supporters, like for example the Loyalist, who were almost 50.000 willing to defend and mantain control of the colonies, but they did not take advantage of that.

George Washington, Commander in Chief. (USA)

Nathanael Greene, General (USA)

Sir William Howe, Commander in Chief ( British forces)

Henry Clinton, Office, (British forces).

Events: Siege of Yorktown and Treaty of Paris.

This events were important because they marked the end of the war, they defined how the events were going to be in the future, how things were going to turn out in the future, the siege because of the surrender of more than 7000 men under Cornwallis command and after that event the battles in America decreased and died out and the Treaty because of how the war developed and concluded it geographically delimitated the territory that now we know as the United States of America.

4 0
3 years ago
How was Stonewall Jackson's army able to surprise the Union army at Chancellorsville?
Natali [406]

Answer:

The correct answers are B, C and D. Stonewall Jackson's army marched secretly to a spot on the side of the Union Army and then they attacked, while the Union forces were not expecting this.

Explanation:

The Battle of Chancellorsville was a major victory for Confederate troops over the Union Army and is one of the jewels of military strategy.   Jackson and Lee masterfully used bluffing and covert shifts to deceive the enemy, and at one point they reached for the opportunity to encircle and completely destroy General H0oker's army.

During this battle, H0oker took a position north of Chancellorsville, leaving his left wing unprotected. Noticing that, Lee attacked with 20,000 people against Ho0ker's left wing, and sent Jackson to H0oker's right wing with 25,000 people. On May 2, Jackson attacked and pushed H0oker's right wing. The next day, H0oker took his forces to better positions. On the same day, General Sedgwick repulsed Lee's weak forces near Fredricksburg, but reinforcements that arrived on May 4 forced Sedgwick to withdraw. On May 6, Lee ordered a general attack. H0oker saw that the battle was lost and retreated to the left bank of the Repehenek.

Only the death of Stonewall Jackson after his men mistaken him for an enemy in the night fight saved the Union from destruction. As a result, the Confederacy's victory was not nearly as complete as it should have been.

However, the Union army escaped, and the death of Jackson, considered the Confederate's best field tactician and General Lee's irreplaceable right hand, was a catastrophe from which Southern troops never fully recovered.

7 0
3 years ago
Chief Powhatans address to captain John smith commonlit
rjkz [21]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

You forgot to include a question. Here it is only a statement.

We assume that you want to know more about Chief Powhatan's address to Captain John Smith.

If that is the case, then we can comment on the following.

Chief Powhatan(1545-1618), who was also known at that time as Chief Wahunsenacawk, was the leader of the tribe Powhatan, an important Native American Indian tribe that settled in the territory of Jamestown, Virginia. Let's have in mind that European colonizers arrived at Jamestown in May 1607.

In the beginning, the Native American Indians helped the white Europeans to survive in this new territory and the weather conditions. The Native Indians even helped the Europeans giving them food to survive. But the good relationship did not last for so long because the Europeans were interested in exploiting the many raw materials and natural resources of the region, and the Indians heavily opposed to this. There were many differences that confronted the Native Indians with white Europeans.

That is why Chief Powhatan addressed John Smith, a leader of the colonists, trying to peacefully resolve the many issues that confronted both sides.

5 0
3 years ago
Do the events surrounding the Election of 2000 justify changes to the Electoral College?
-Dominant- [34]
<span>No it did not because the electoral college is necessary as it protects smaller (minority) states from larger (federal) states and it probably is one of the most efficient forms of elections</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The geographic location of Israel was important because
    6·2 answers
  • How long did the crusades usually take??
    14·2 answers
  • What was it that eventually corrected the abuses of the factory system ?
    15·1 answer
  • Which did settlers bring to american indian lands in the west
    12·1 answer
  • how would you compare the tone of the text to Hideyoshi's 1587 edicts restricting the spread of Christianity and the activities
    6·1 answer
  • Truman fired MacArthur: Select one: a. to preserve civilian control of the military. b. because of party politics. c. for incomp
    6·1 answer
  • A lack of Hungarian representatives in the government and ____________________ lead to uprisings against Austrian rule.
    13·2 answers
  • Come here and answer for free points and a chance to be brainliest
    8·2 answers
  • Which phrase best completes the diagram?
    8·1 answer
  • Please help im doing finles a ( i know i suck at spelling) PLEASE
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!