Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
It should be left to state control because, its at a state level. a state level such as your local police , fire fighters , mayors etc. if it was brought to national control it would be chaos as national control is every state in the US.
sorry im kinda busy so i cant answer as good as i want to but it should be left to state control.
Participant observation I think hope this helps :)
It would be B.
the executive branch is responsible for enforcing laws.
