Beta= 1.3
Debt to equity ratio= 0.4
Market rate of return= 11.6%
= 11.6/100
= 0.116
Tax rate= 32%
= 32/100
= 0.32
Risk free rate= 3.3%
= 3.3/100
= 0.033
Pretax cost of debt= 7.2%
= 7.2/100
= 0.072
The firm's WACC can be calacluated as follows
RS= 0.033+1.3(0.116-0.033)
= 0.033+1.3(0.083)
= 0.033+0.1079
= 0.1409
WACC= (1/1.4)(0.1409)+(2/1.4) (0.072)(1-0.32)
= (0.7142)(0.1409) + (1.4285)(0.072)(0.68)
= 0.1006+0.0699
= 0.1705(100)
= 17.05%
Hence the firm's WACC is 17.05%
Answer:
7 sweets
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because the constant of proportionality is 7 since 35/5 since it is the ratio for Natasha. Since 7 is the constant of proportionality, you multiply it by the difference of the ratios. In this case, Natasha and Henry have a difference of 1 in ratios. Since it is a difference of 1, you multiply that by the constant of proportionality, 7. 7 X 1 is equal to 7, so Natasha gets 7 more sweets than Henry.
Answer:
its b. AC=DF
btw where is the problem came from?
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1. 8.2 * 6.7 / 0.46
2. 54.94 / 0.46
3. 119.434783
4: 120
Answer:
The first bottle has 4 pints or 8 cups or 2 quarts. The seconds has 1.25 quarts or 5 cups or 2 1/2 pints. The one with 4 pints would have more so it would be a better deal.
Step-by-step explanation:
