The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
We can actually deduce here that Krakauer's techniques in "Into the Wild" supports his
development of the life of Chris McCandless by: D. Starting the book by revealing McCandless's death.
<h3>What is "Into The Wild"?</h3>
"Into The Wild" is actually known be a non-fiction story that was written by Jon Krakauer. The story talks about Chris McCandless who died in the wilderness in Alaska.
We can see here that the technique Krakauer used here is by starting the book by revealing McCandless's death.
Learn more about "Into The Wild" on brainly.com/question/25909642
#SPJ1
Answer:1. intro
2.analysis of first text
3.analysis of second text
4. Comparison
5. Conclusion
Explanation: jus got it right on edgenuity 2020!
Plz give brainliest! BYE HAVE A GREAT DAY!
For lunch we can have either soup or sandwiches.
