Answer:
All of the above are true.
Explanation:
The law of diminishing returns was first formulated by the classic economist David Ricardo. It presupposes a technical relationship between input and output, which is not scientifically demonstrable but only empirically. In practice, in a generic production system, at any contribution of any factor, that is, land, labor, capital, machines, etc. there is no proportionally increasing production increase.
Normally it is assumed that the law does not always come into operation but only when the variable input exceeds a certain threshold. For example, the increase of workers on an assembly line certainly allows a proportional increase in production, but only until the entire system begins to suffer from malfunctions due to logistics or work organization, precisely because of the its getting bigger. Large industrial plants have shown that they must be divided into sections, however coordinated, precisely because of the decreasing returns. This is because the increase in the number of workers and the mass of the plants does not correspond to a consequent increase in production.
The elements that would have to be in place for a contract to be unconscionable would be that
- They were under pressure
- They were misled
- They did not have the right information
<h3>What is meant by a contract?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the fact that two people or more have agreed to do business with themselves.
In order to be a contract, one person would have to create a bargain and the other would be the one that would agree to the terms.
It is unconscionable at the time when the contract is done and the person or one of the parties is found not to have been able to make the contract agreement at their right frame of mind. In this case, the law has the power to protect this party.
Hence they would have to rule in his favor. Therefore to be unconscionable, a contract would have to have been misled, have been made under duress and without the adequate information.
Read more on contracts here:
brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Building A/c Dr $312,276
Land A/c Dr $276,924
To Cash A/c $61,900
To Notes payable A/c $527,300
(Being the purchase of building and land for cash and note payable is recorded)
The computation of the notes payable is shown below:
= Total purchase value - cash paid
= $589,200 - $61,900
= $527,300
The discount lost account is used under the net method for inventory.
<h3><u>
What is discount?</u></h3>
- When a security is trading for less than its intrinsic or basic value, it is said to be trading at a discount in the world of finance and investment.
- When a bond's price is trading below its par value, or face value, in the fixed-income market, a discount is present.
- The extent of the discount is equal to the difference between the price paid for a security and its par value.
- Bonds may trade at a discount for a variety of reasons, such as rising interest rates, problems with the underlying company's credit, or riskiness when compared to comparable bonds.
The discount rate, an interest rate used to calculate the time worth of money, should not be confused with a discount.
Know more about discount with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/3541148
#SPJ4
Answer:
The company will have to pay $5,100 per employee in separation costs if these exit interviews are implemented next year
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Percentage downsize in the workforce = 15% = 0.15
Cost of exit interviews = $100
Normal separation cost = $5,000
Now,
Total separation cost per employee = Cost of exit interviews + Normal separation cost
= $100 + $5,000
= $5,100
Therefore,
The company will have to pay $5,100 per employee in separation costs if these exit interviews are implemented next year
