I think it is 29%? I am not 100% sure though...
Answer:
1) B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s.
2) A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution table is shown below:
Last Digit Frequency
0 9
1 1
2 1
3 3
4 1
5 11
6 1
7 0
8 3
9 1
1. Based on the distribution table, we see a very disproportionate distribution. There is a high frequency of 0's and 5's. This lays credence to the heights being reported rather than measured. As such, option B is the correct answer
<u>B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s</u>.
2. Since the heights were reported and not measured, they are most certainly not accurate. The conclusion is that the result is not accurate. As such, option A is the correct answer
<u>A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported</u>.
Answer: All of the numbers in the sequence are going up twice the amount as before. The next three terms will be 208, 416, 832
Answer:
x=5 x=3
Step-by-step explanation:
x^2 - 8x + 15 = 0
Factor
What 2 numbers multiply to 15 and add to -8
-5*-3 = 15
-5-3 = -8
(x-5)(x-3) =0
Using the zero product property
x-5 =0 x-3 =0
x=5 x=3
