Answer:
Dual federalism happened during the 1790s to 1930s) while Co-operative federalism was seen around 1930 to 1960.
Explanation:
Dual federalism also known as the layer cake federalism is a system in which the state and the national governments operated separately. It was practiced between 1790s to 1930s and power was split between these two governments in order to ensure balance between the two of them.
In the Co-operative federalism, the state and federal governments are seen to have equal share of power for them to collectively resolve common challenges they encountered. This system of government, also known as the marble cake federalism was seen around 1930 to 1960, when there was great depression and Second World War. During these periods, the united states needed the two levels of government to work collectively.
Answer:
President Wilson used the word "autocratic" to refer to governments that the head of state has unlimited control of the nation.
Explanation:
An autocratic government is a type of government in which all the power of control of the nation is in the hands of a single person who controls the nation the way he wants and no one can prevent it. An example of this type of government can be seen in countries under the dictatorial regime. In this regime, all public laws, decisions and policies are based solely on what the government wants.
In other words, in an autocratic government, the leader has unlimited power, and can have highly damaging and petty decisions that put society not only in danger, but often in very poor living conditions.
Westcoast is coast of submergence (except Malabar Coast) while east coast is an emergentcoast. These imply that sea is deeper in west coastthan sea on east coast. So, west coast has favourable conditions for natural harbours. ... Therefore it becomes difficult for ships to reach the east coast covered with sediments
Experiments are used to psychology to gather observational data that is collected in artificially controlled laboratory conditions. This makes possible to isolate the action/treatment/behaviour we seek to observe from external conditions and to study its effects. In turn, it would be possible to infer casuality relations which are not contaminated by the effects of other variables that could be acting in the real (not controlled) world.
The problem with such experiments is how to generalize the results obtained outside the lab. The behaviour observed there may not happen at all in the real world, or differ in terms of the social conditions of each person's environment: gender, race, religious beliefs, social class, etc.
For example, imagine an experiment in which a woman has to punish one of the other people participating after some interactions. She punishes a man who tried to deceive her. Imagine this woman out of the lab, taking into account that she lives in a very religious patriarchal community. She would never dare to contradict a man in her real world (maybe she would if the social conditions were different). Hence, it could not be concluded that people always act in their better self-interest (punishing the meanest person) in this case, but that sometimes self-interest is conditioned by social surrounding features that are present not in the lab.
Answer:
Answer is space-between.
Explanation:
Note that the flex items are the items in flex containers.
The flex container will expands items to fill available free space or shrink them in order to prevent overflow.