1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RoseWind [281]
3 years ago
6

What is the purpose of examining a witness about a prior statement it show that the witness

Law
2 answers:
Allushta [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Is untrustworthy or could be lying. Looks/sounds suspicious or changed there story

Explanation:

PolarNik [594]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: could be lying or with holding information

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Question: what 2 forces act on a "still" object? (an object that is not moving)
Nezavi [6.7K]
A push or pull can act on a stationary object.
3 0
3 years ago
State two reasons why reviewing past case decisions is important for learning business law
LenKa [72]

Answer:

it helps  because one understand how the decisions were made and the right it has to be used

7 0
3 years ago
What effects could a lack of voter participation have?
Mrrafil [7]

Still, low turnouts can lead to unequal representation among various parts of the population. In developed countries, non-voters tend to be concentrated in particular demographic and socioeconomic groups, especially the young and the poor.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment.  Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

8 0
2 years ago
In criminal law when someone does a wrong its called a crime. In civil law its called a ?
enot [183]

Answer:

Criminal law is the body of law that deals with crime and the legal punishment of party responding is called the defendant and the process is called litigation

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Virtual Assistant avatar
    5·1 answer
  • To define an act as deviant is to make a subjective judgment, but it can be objectively determined that all deviant acts have a
    9·1 answer
  • According to the geneva convention, 4.31 Incendiary weapons include any weapon or munition which is designed to set fire to obje
    5·1 answer
  • What are concurrent powers? Provide an example of a power that is concurrent.
    11·2 answers
  • What force would a baseball exert if gravity pulls it down and its mass is 8 kg?​
    11·1 answer
  • Federal district court judges hear A. mostly criminal cases, with an occasional civil case. B. criminal cases only. C. civil cas
    5·1 answer
  • Reading SIgH RedAyinG
    8·1 answer
  • 20. Physical health problems, mental health/emotional problems, or family problems caused by a person's drug use is
    14·1 answer
  • Why is the high court and the supreme court of India known as the court of the records?
    6·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of law?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!