Educación Because que se han hecho en la ciudad y no han podido ser muy fuertes porque el mundo se han convertido
An Act to regulate the Time and Manner of administering certain Oaths was the first law passed by the United States Congress after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. It was signed by President George Washington on June 1, 1789, and parts of it remain in effect to this day
1. As the parole officer for a single mother with three hyperactive, attention-deficit disorder young children, I think that C. One should do what is best for everyone.
2. In the expanded view of duty, especially with respect to protecting society, resolving the situation of this woman without filing a violation report might be <u>more ethical</u>.
<h3>What is an ethical duty?</h3>
An ethical duty is the responsibility to recognize, interpret, and act upon multiple principles and values based on given standards.
However, being ethical does not imply that ethical guidelines must be followed blindly. Some circumstances demand different approaches to achieve what is best for everyone involved.
Thus, ethical responsibility demands that the parole officer deals with each case with courage, fairness, and integrity.
Learn more about ethical principles at brainly.com/question/14334089 and brainly.com/question/18401975
#SPJ1
Explanation:
The law of insider trading has been called everything from a "theoretical mess" to "astonishingly dysfunctional," with calls for change from Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission to clarify the scope of the prohibition. But is the law really so bad? The elements are now well established, despite gray areas around the edges like other white collar crimes. Congress and the general public have embraced insider trading as something clearly wrongful. If the law needs to be changed, the most likely push would be to expand it by adopting the possession theory of liability used in Rule 14e-3 for tender offers and the European Union that makes trading on almost any confidential information subject to prosecution.
A major strength that came with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was that the Federal government did not need a claim to be brought to enforce civil rights legislation so this is <u>True</u>.
<h3>What did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 do?</h3>
It made it a federal crime to discriminate against people based on demographic factors such as color, race and religion.
Because such discrimination became a federal crime, the federal government now had to right to enforce civil rights legislation without people bringing claims because they were simply enforcing the law.
Find out more on the Civil Rights Act at brainly.com/question/1261890.
