Answer:
install socratic that give u all answer for everything
First of all we dont know what authors your talking about how are we supposed to help..?
Answer:
im thinking last
Explaining i apologize very much if I'm wrong but i think its the last i might be wrong but u don't have to listen to me i just think the man is very wise u can pick what ever gut feeling u have u can listened to the others if they do answer your questing
Answer: I would actually disagree on this
Explanation: In America there was a time period where conscientious objectors were ordered by the government to vote. However, their denial to vote brought them severe prison time, torture and opposition. If 16 year olds could vote then people with religious beliefs or who are conscientious objectors would be bullied by political peers and such pressure could obligate them to go against their conscious and norms. From ages 16 to 18 a person is too young to commit the right decisions without a person actually influencing them. A person is capable of thinking for themselves without outward influences when they are about 21 and up. Also, voting is not necessary, it’s simple tradition. It’s a superficial thing, people think they choose the president but in reality it’s the Supreme Court who makes that decision for you. You could fact check that if you attend a civics class or if you directly ask a representative from congress.
The correct option is B.
In the question given above, you are to develop an essay that is in favor of vegetable farming. The two objects that are been compared here are vegetables and lawns. Thus, any resource that will be used in supporting your argument must be one that deals with the relationships, benefits and the demerits that exist between keeping a front lawn and keeping a vegetable garden. Looking at all the options given above, it is only option B that expresses the relationship between the two.