Answer:
The amount that is needed to be covered by the policy is $3,500
Explanation:
Coverage B - Other kind of structures offer coverage for the real property which is to be located on the desired location and need to be separated from the dwelling through clear space.
Coverage A- upto 10%
So, in the situation, $8,000 is involved for other structures. Lightning is covered under the peril so that the policy will pay an amount of $3,500 (Which is $4,000 [$3,000 + $1,000] - $500)
The net present value of project A that Perit Industies plans to undertake is $-79,009.91.
<h3>What is the net present value?</h3>
Net present value is the present value of after-tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.
NPV can be calculated using a financial calculator
- Cash flow in year 0 = -165,000
- Cash flow in year 1 - 6 = 21,00
- Cash flow in year 6 = 9500
I = 14%
NPV = $-79,009.91.
Please find attached the complete question. To learn more about net present value, please check: brainly.com/question/25748668
Based on the distance between locations, the total distance moved in the week will be<u> 6,700 meters. </u>
<h3>Distance between the departments </h3>
Assuming that Departments X, Y and Z are in areas I, II and III respectively. The following will be true:
- Department X is located 10 meters from Y but 20 meters from Z.
- Department Y is located 10 meters from Z.
<h3>Total distance traveled</h3>
This can be found by multiplying the loads carried across departments by the distance between the locations of these departments.
= ( (Loads from X to Y x distance of X and Y) + (Loads from X to Z x Distance of X and Z)) + ( (Loads from Y to X x distance of X and Y) + (Loads from Y to Z x Distance of Y and Z)) + ( (Loads from Z to Y x distance of Z and X) + (Loads from Z to Y x Distance of Y and Z))
= ( (0 x 10) + 80 x 20)) + ( (30 x 10) + (150 x 10) ) + ( (100 x 20) + 130 x 10) )
= 1,600 + 1,800 + 3,300
= 6,700 meters
In conclusion, the total distance would be 6,700 meters.
Find out more on minimizing costs at brainly.com/question/1380316.
Answer:
Option B Evaluate the alternatives
Explanation:
The reason is that if don't know the pros and cons of an alternative move then how can you choose the better option. To make a rational decision which is unbiased and which favors the best available option on the basis of maximum benefits and fewer risks, we have to evaluate whether the available alternative option is better option or not.
After evaluation we choose the better option available which is option d "select the best alternative".
Answer with Explanation:
If the markets are not efficient then there higher probability that the investor can earn from the price fluctuations because the markets are not valuation is different. The investor would be spending money on gaining the benefit of price fluctuations which will be for short term only and he will be acting in time to continuously earn money from the fluctuation.
The investors and financial institutions will master the quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis of the price changes to guess where will be the change going to happen and we must take advantage of it.
The passive investment is the investment which the management intents to hold for a longer period to benefit from it. If the markets are not efficient then it is useless to hold an passive investment. Rather holding a passive investment it would be better to hold an active investment which benefit more as we will be beating the market by price differences. The possession of passive investment is less expensive as apposed to active investments because less fee is charged by the broker. Active investment would be risky investment because we will continuously gaining and loosing money.
The financial advisers opt to creating a portfolio of active and passive investments to lower the unsystematic risk and increase the gain limit to average return.
