The first thing we are going to do is rewrite the expression correctly.
We have:
root (27x ^ 12 / 300x ^ 8)
Rewriting:
root ((27/300) * (x ^ 12 / x ^ 8))
root ((9/100) * (x ^ (12-8)))
root ((9/100) * (x ^ (4)))
root ((9/100) * (x ^ (4)))
3 * x ^ 2 * root ((1/100)
(3 * x ^ 2) / 10
(3/10) * (x ^ 2)
Answer:
(3/10) * (x ^ 2)
The simplest interpretation would go a little something like this:
We know that we want the total donation amount to be more than $7,900, so we can set up this inequality to begin with

Where
D is the total donations raised (in dollars). How do we find D? Well, we just add up the total number of table reservations sold and the total number of single tickets sold. If we let
r stand for the number of reservation tickets and
s stand for the number of single tickets, then we have

So, the inequality representing this situation would be

And that would probably be fine for this problem.
<span><em>Footnote:</em>
</span>Of course, if this were a real-life scenario, we'd need to take some additional details into account: How many tables do we have? How many people can be seated at each table?
Answer:
1 10/12
Step-by-step explanation:
Take the fractions and get them to the same bottom number, 12. So it would be 5 4/12 - 3 6/12.
Take 1 away from 5 to get 4 and the one you pulled would be 12/12(also equal to 1). 4 16/12 - 3 6/12 would be 1 10/12
Answer:
omg that question is impossible to answer
By using different math operations