No, a macromolecule is a large organic molecule
Hope this helps
Answer:
In my opinion, a reduction in our use of energy would not be a historical step backwards.
Explanation:
We already know that humanity's consumption of fossil fuels is wreaking havoc on the ecosystem. Fossil fuels pollute the environment where they are generated and utilized, and their continued usage harms the climate of the entire world. Nonetheless, altering our behaviors in a significant sense has proven to be quite difficult. As a result, it is not impossible to reduce our energy use significantly, but we may take little efforts to change the way we create energy, such as using fossil fuels. Because fossil fuels are so detrimental to our environment, we should try to reduce its use, but not at the risk of improving our surroundings. There are several methods to change the way we utilize energy now into something more sustainable.
*You can also answer this question based on opinion I think, hope this helps :)
if we wipe out an animals natural habitat, or introduce new wildlife the animals could die. This could cause a major problem in the areas ecosystem. That is what i know, and i think that major problems would happen, like to many of one species, which takes all the food from the other species, causing major problems, and even more animals to die.
C. Observations are made in a living mouse
An in vivo experiment consists on conducting the study in a whole living organism, in this case, a mouse
