Answer:
a. 9.43%
Explanation:
IRR is the rate of return that makes initial investment equal to present value of cash inflows
Initial investment = Annuity*[1 - 1 /(1 + r)^n] /r
1250 = 325 * [1 - 1 / (1 + r)^5] /r
Using trial and error method, i.e., after trying various values for R, lets try R as 9.43%
1250 = 325 * [1 - 1 / (1 + 0.0943)5] /0.0943
1250 = 325 * 3.846639
1250 = 1,250
Therefore, The project IRR is 9.43%
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Triton Consulting Income Statement For the Year Ended April 30, 20Y3:
Fees earned 279000
Less: Expenses:
Salary expenses = 242000
Supplies expenses 1650
Depreciation expense. 900
Miscellaneous expenses 2000
Total expense = 246550
Net income 32450
Triton Consulting Balance Sheet April 30, 20Y3
Assets
Current assets
Cash 21500
Account receivable 51150
Supplies 750
Total current asset = 73400
Property, plant and equipments
Office equipment 32000
Accumulated Depreciation 5400
Total property,plant and equipment = 26600
Total asset = 100,000
Liabilities
Current liabilities:
Account payable: 3350
Salary payable: 2000
Total liabilities = 5350
Stockholders equity
Common stock 20000
Retained earnings 74650
Total stockholders equity = 94650
Total liability and stockholders equity = 100,000
The cost of adding more options. Supply and demand: would the students want to have salad for lunch, or would it go to waste?
Answer:
Ricardo’s Theory of Comparative Advantage
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the term used to define the ability of an individual, firm or country to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than that if it’s competitors or trade partners. Opportunity cost is the benefit lost from the second best alternative.
When a country can produce a product more efficiently (i.e maximum output using minimum resources) than that of its trade partners, it is known as that it has absolute advantage in that product. India tends to have absolute advantage in both business processes outsourcing as well as producing agricultural commodities as it is mentioned that it can produce both of these more efficiently than the United States.
However, although it has absolute advantage in both, it is still less efficient in producing agricultural commodities when compared to business process outsourcing. In other words, if it attempts to produce agricultural commodities in-house, the benefit lost from the second best alternative: business process outsourcing is high. The opportunity cost is higher when it produces agricultural commodities than it is when it does business process outsourcing. Hence, due to the law of comparative advantage, it chooses to specialize in business process outsourcing and imports agricultural commodities.
