All categories

3 years ago

Negative 16 divided by negative 10

Mathematics

2 answers:

Lorico [155]3 years ago

8 0

1.6 is the answer. I think

galben [10]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

the answer is 1.6

Step-by-step explanation:

when calculating a problem like negative 16 divided by negative 10, you can simply ignore the fact that they are negative numbers and divide 16 by 10 to get the answer.

You might be interested in

What are the coordinates of the midpoint of GH with endpoints (-2,5) and H(4,1)?

kozerog [31]

Answer:

(1, 3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given coordinates of 2 endpoints, G(-2, 5) and H(4, 1), midpoint of AB is calculated as shown below:

Midpoint (M) of GH, for G(-2, 5) and H(4, 1) is given as:

$M(\frac{x_1 + x_2}{2}, \frac{y_1 + y_2}{2})$

Let $G(-2, 5) = (x_1, y_1)$

$H(4, 1) = (x_2, y_2)$

Thus:

$M(\frac{-2 + 4}{2}, \frac{5 + 1}{2})$

$M(\frac{2}{2}, \frac{6}{2})$

$M(1, 3)$

Coordinates of the midpoint of GH = (1, 3).

6 0

2 years ago

Mice and Pain Can you tell if a mouse is in pain by looking at its facial expression? A new study believes you can. The study1 c

kotykmax [81]

Explanation:

1. a) Null hypothesis: There is no statistically significant relationship between the mouse grimace scale and the amount of pain felt by mouse.

b) Alternate hypothesis: There is a statistically-significant relationship between the mouse grimace scale and the amount of pain felt by mouse.

2. Yes, because a statistically significant data implies that there is sufficient evidence to believe the study, based on the results of the findings.

3. No, since the variables are different in this case. Here we are dealing with a non-painful solution so there may be no sample correlation as extreme as that found in the original study.

4. Possibly, because every hypothesis is an assumption until it is proven. Thus, in every statistical research, there may be different findings.

3 0

2 years ago

Given: EL- tangent, EK- secant Prove: EJ·LK = EL·LJ

drek231 [11]

Answer:

This is possible.

Step-by-step explanation:

We can say that m<E=m<E, because of the Reflexive Property

Then, we have angles JKL and ELJ, which are equal through the peripheral angle theorem.

With these two angles, we can say that triangles ELK and EJL are similar, by the Angle-Angle Postulate (AA).

Then we can create this ratio through the Corresponding Parts of Similar Triangles Theorem, (CPST), $\frac{LK}{LJ} =\frac{EL}{EJ}$ .