Jerome’s two main modes of humor are satire and observational humor. Satire is a mode of writing the uses irony to criticize society. It is often humorous, but does not necessarily have to be. Although some satirical novels are very dark, Jerome’s lighthearted satire is mostly concerned with illustrating and gently mocking the pretensions and hypocrisies of certain social conventions.
Observational humor sometimes overlaps with satire, especially in this case. It is a type of humor that draws its subject matter from human behavior and daily life, attempting to show the absurdity of human behavior by focusing of everyday, banal details. One example of observational humor is Jerome’s discussion of people who claim never to get seasick. The digression is meant to illustrate how most people present themselves as one type of person, in a way that's almost expected, even if they are all quite different.
In fact, the frequent use of this type of humor does provide a fairly consistent absurdist worldview. Most of Jerome's irony suggests that people are usually unaware of the extent to which they delude themselves. For instance, J.'s tone reveals that he clearly understands that he does not suffer from so many diseases, and yet he continues to progress as though it were true. Throughout the novel, Jerome revels in illustrating the illusions that men and women construct, usually fooling themselves most of all. Even though the novel remains rooted in everyday concerns, Jerome sees a regular absurdist vein that runs throughout them.
Because it gives off rays which can be called signals. Hope this helps
Oooh oooh oooh! Flowers & food! Oooh oooh oooh! Flowers & food! This is a story how meat got baked dude! The fire was fly'in through the sssskkkkkyyyyyy, and the flowers turned to herbs, and the cattle was out front when the fire came down and cooked the meat up! That was how the food turned out and now we sing this sing in memory of those who died for our lunch. OOOH OOOH OOOH! FLOWERS & FOOD! (Ba-da BA!)
I hope this helps! :P =D
Answer: when a writer points to a problem caused by social customs without explicitly challenging those customs.
A social commentary is the use of rhetorical devices in order to comment on the problems of society. This is usually a critique, and it is intended to promote change or to appeal to people's sense of justice. However, when this commentary is done subconsciously, the writer points towards the problem but does not explicitly challenge the customs.
The correct answer as to which pronoun best completes the sentence and how the pronoun is used is D. me; indirect object.
In a sentence where there are two objects, where one is direct, and the other one indirect, the rule is that the first object that will be written in the sentence is the indirect, and it will be followed by a direct object. Since the direct object here is <em>some good pointers, </em>it means that the indirect one is <em>me.
</em><em /><em />Also, you cannot choose the pronoun <em>I </em>as the correct answer, as that is the pronoun used as a subject, not an object.
