Answer:
The answer is A. They all have a bill of rights.
Explanation:
Bill of rights comprises of 10 amendments aimed at safeguarding the individual liberty. At that time, the federalists argued that a bill of rights is not necessary as the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.
But Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty and freedom.
I believe it is 71 B.C correct me if im wrong
Answer:
Muslim forces ultimately expelled the European Christians who invaded the eastern Mediterranean repeatedly in the 12th and 13th centuries—and thwarted their effort to regain control of sacred Holy Land sites such as Jerusalem. Still, most histories of the Crusades offer a largely one-sided view, drawn originally from European medieval chronicles, then filtered through 18th and 19th-century Western scholars.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The subject of the resolution that James Madison proposed to the United States Congress of confederation was the creation of a bicameral Congress in order to have a legislative branch divided into two chambers: one chamber would be the House of Representatives or the lower chamber, and the other would be the Senate or the upper chamber.
James Madison, who had drafted the Virginia Plan, came up with this resolution in order to advance in the debates and negotiations between Federalists and Antifederalists delegates during the Constitutional Convention held at the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in the summer of 1787.
For 4, your best choice is: B) Americans were divided on the issue of fighting in vietnam...
Reason: While the louder speaking majority wanted peace (as they were tired of war), there was still a faction of people who believe it is best to continue to fight. President Nixon believed that these people were the majority, hence the name 'silent majority'. However, the peace group was able to win, with the withdrawal of US troops and the eventual takeover of South Vietnam by communist troops.
Main Idea and Details What did the Supreme Court mean by "seperate but equal?" Why did many people feel this idea was faulty?
Answer: The term "separate but equal" was initiated too help garner Southern support. The Supreme Court termed it so that the South can still segregate many of the public areas, as long as 'they have equal chances and are relatively the same.' However, this idea was faulty, because many believed that if it was separate, that it will still 'not be equal', as the people do not feel that they are treated the same. As long as they are separate and not equal, 'the people will not feel that it is the same'.
hope this helps
