Answer:
Modest short term deterrent, but will need mass executions to be effective
Explanation:
The question has already been answered but I guess you need an explanation.
In the deterrence theory by Professor Land and his colleagues, they assumes that offenders are rational, I.e. they know the law and the penalties attached to defaulting the law..
They're are three points to take note of in this study;
1. For execution to have a deterrent effect, then it means a huge number of execution must have taken place
2. Most of any deterrent effect of execution of homicide occurs immediately after the execution is made public
3. 5 to 10 homicides would deterred in a year if there are 10 to 20 executions using 0.5 homicides deterred on a monthly basis.
Answer:
Binocular
Explanation:
Binocular, is information taken in by two eyes binocular versus monocular. By collecting the information from both the eyes and integrating it. Your brain is constructing a three-dimensional interpretation of the world. But three-d is another perception that is interpreted by depth perception that is called stereo psis. Binocular cues give us the natural ability to determine in space objects that sit relative to our bodies. Our sense of depth perception enables us to discern where to place our feet if the ground is sloping up and down. It determines how far are the objects from us. Depth perception allows us to discriminate between things far and near.
Because the witnesses had different viewpoints so they might have seen different things..
If for example the witness is somehow related to the victim, his/her point of view might have been compromised and couldn't be used
hope this helps
The waterways in the southern colonies were especially important because they<span> could ship goods from the interior of the south to the coast where they could be sent to Europe.</span>
<h3>
Answer: A. competition among producers</h3>
==========================================================
Explanation:
Competition reduces prices while also increasing the quality of the product or service. Companies that don't do such things will likely be out of business since the customer can go elsewhere for a better experience. The more competition, the better consumers are off.
In contrast, monopolies are bad for consumers because one company can set the price to whatever they want (to a certain level of course) and the customer has no choice to pay that price. The customer does not have any other option so the company is in full control. This leads to decline in quality because quality is often associated with cost. Safety standards may decline as well. So this is why monopolies are not good for the customer. In cases where there are monopolies, such as with power utilities, it is strongly advised that government regulations are put in place. This way the company doesn't completely exploit the customer.
In short, we can eliminate choice D because it runs counter to choice A.
Choice C can also be eliminated because if you had a decrease in supply, then the price of the product is likely to go up if you hold other factors in check (such as keeping the same level of demand). Higher prices do not benefit consumers unless those consumers had an equal or better wage increase.
A raise in interest rates means that it becomes more expensive to borrow money. For example, a raise in interest rates means that mortgage rates go higher. This negative is slightly counterbalanced with the fact that savings accounts interest rates go up as well. Overall, I think a rise in interest rates means that consumers ultimately pay more, so we can cross choice B off the list as well.
