Reply is not a component of the SQ4R method.
From what I could find, Sirens are asking for help. The song they sing is a cry for help. They are described as acting/singing like a "damsels in distress".
The second part of this question (<em>You must include an evaluation of YOUR congressional representative with at least TWO specific examples of why you approve or disapprove of his/her performance</em>) is a personal task, and only you can complete it. However, we are able to provide some assistance with the first part.
It is true that Congress typically has a very low public opinion rating, while at the same time people rate their individual representatives highly. The main reason for this is the fact that people tend to think of their individual representatives as personally closer to them.
A person's representative tends to come from the same city or neighbourhood as the voter. Moreover, he tends to campaign in this area. Therefore, the voter is able to see his face, hear his voice and listen to his platform often. This creates a sense of trust and a connection between representative and voter. Moreover, as the voter himself votes the representative in, he is also more likely to be hopeful about his performance. All of these factors lead to people rating their own individual representatives more highly than Congress itself.
Answer:
That's nice how about my Poem.
Explanation:
No Need to be a shadow i see you
No need to be muted i can hear you
No need to cut your not paper
No need to Hang your not a coat
No need to Fall apart because of a guy you'll soon find better
No need to play with your life You are not a toy
No need to not feel loved I love you
No need to feel Numb I'm here
No need to pop pills Your loved
No need to Commit suic.ide There is to much to life
I think all I'm saying is Life is Way more then school, job, rest and repeat There's adventures Happy moments and Horrifying times But we all soon get over these things Your in this world in a life For a reason Life it with a purpose ....Kaz
In the very, very simplest terms, judging the validity of an argument starts centers around this process:
1) Identify the rhetoric (Lines of Argument) from the actual, formal reasons. Separate the persuasive language from the actual claims to truth and fact.
2) Analyze those reasons (claims to truth and fact) by identifying their logic (often in the Implicit Reasons) and evidence.
3) Test and evaluate the logic and evidence; identify logical errors and ask whether the evidence can and has been tested and objectively, repeatedly, factually verified.
