An example of a kind of evidence in this statement is:
<h3>What is an expert opinion?</h3>
An expert opinion is a form of evidence from an authoritative source that backs up a point.
In the text above, the U.S News and World Report were experts or authoritative sources that supported the writer's main point. So, option A is right.
Learn more about expert opinion here:
brainly.com/question/14419930
#SPJ1
The correct answer to your question is: Charles killed Mrs. Huffington, if I'm not mistaken.
Hope this is the answer you were looking for and that it helps!! :)
Answer:
To realize that recycling can save the planet.
Explanation:
In the cartoon, the man is shown throwing the Earth into a trash heap behind himself, symbolizing that by not recycling, we are hurting the planet.
Answer:
Two sentences use "eating" as a participle:
B. My eating habits are a lot healthier than they used to be.
D. This problem has been eating away at me, and I can't sleep.
Explanation:
The gerund and the present participle are identical to the eye. They both are formed by adding -ing to a verb root. Thus, "eating" can be a gerund or a participle, according to the context.
The difference between them is quite simple. The gerund acts like a noun, having the same functions a noun would have in a sentence: subject, object of a verb or of a preposition, and subject complement. The present participle, on the other hand, will either act as an adjective, modifying a noun or a pronoun, or be a part of a continuous tense.
That is precisely what we have in options B and D. In option B, "eating" is an adjective modifying the noun "habits". In letter D, "eating" is a part of the Present Perfect Continuous tense. Therefore, in options B and D, "eating" is a participle:
B. My eating habits are a lot healthier than they used to be.
D. This problem has been eating away at me, and I can't sleep.
