Answer:
d. Firm A will spend $4,000.
Explanation:
Since Firm B cost of Cleanup before it gets the the river is less than the cost of pollution permits, it will choose to clean up its pollution.
However, since Firm A cleanup cost per ton ($100) is greater than the cost of the pollution permit, it will choose to buy permits.
Maximum Allowable Number of Permits=40
Therefore, Firm A will clean up 10 Tons and dump 40 Tons of Waste.
Cost =(10 Tons *$100)+(40 Tons * $75)
=$(1000+3000)
=$4000.
Firm A will spend $4000.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option D: All of the above.
Explanation:
To begin with, a company's primary strategy that focus on completing the main goal of the company of increasing the sales and with that the profits is considered to be the most important element that the business has in order to keep existing and therefore that as the time passes and the context around the organization changes, that strategy evolves. And there are a lot of reasones why that could happen, including the market conditions that vary over the pass of years as well as the need to react to the competitors decisions in order to keep fighting for the market. And other consequence that may help the change of the strategy is the effort itself of managers to make the strategy better as ideas turn to came out.
Answer: conducted substantial business with Ohio residents through the Web site.
Explanation: The sliding - scale standard confirms when exercising jurisdiction over an out of state defendant is allowed. It is only allowed when significant business has been conducted by this out of state company over the Internet with another state. In this case the out of state defendant is Trading Post, a Washington company, and it has dealt in transactions over the Internet with the state of Ohio via its website. Because the business conducted in Ohio is significant, it gives Robert the grounds to sue Trading Post, even though Trading Post is not based in the same state as Robert.
Answer:
$147,400
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of goods manufactured is shown below:
= Direct materials used + Direct labor cost + Manufacturing overhead cost + beginning work-in-process inventory - ending work-in-process inventory
= $56,400 + $30,100 + $52,400 + $29,000 - $20,500
= $147,400
We considered the applied manufacturing overhead cost instead of actual manufacturing cost
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is the case because tax cuts and government spending are instruments that could be used in expansionary fiscal policy.
Note that reduced taxes usually have a direct impact on the disposable income of a economy not the composition of labor demand. Tax cuts leads directly to consumption and savings increase, resulting from increase in disposable income in the economy.
