There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers.
1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme
-p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah.
P2- theme
-p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point,
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes.
2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme.
3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.
Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing.
Good luck
Answer:
1: Traffic was moving at a snail's pace.
Explanation:
An Idiom is like a phrase:
It's raining cats and dogs out there.
"Raining cats and dogs" is the idiom, as with this answer, it's, "moving at a snail's pace"
Part of that evidence had to do with what he said that t<span>he Vietnamese people proclaimed their own independence in 1945. Even though they quoted the American Declaration of Independence in their own document of freedom, USA refused to recognize them. Mr King said that instead USA decided to support France in its reconquest of her former colony. He stated: "</span><span>Our government felt then that the people in vietnam were not "ready" for independence, and we again fell victim to the deadly Western arrogance that has poisoned the international atmosphere for so long.</span>" he was presenting Usa as supporters of France but not liberators of China
