Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Yessvscvvajsjdjsjsjk isisisi. Ososos
When two species occupy the same niche, they compete for all the resources they need. The superiority of one species over another forces others to adapt and endanger them. This is called conflict elimination.
No two species can have exactly the same niche. Otherwise, you will be in direct competition for resources. In this case, one species is better than the other. When a lost species fails to adapt, it leads to extinction.
The competitive exclusion principle states that two species cannot occupy exactly the same niche in a habitat. In other words, different species cannot coexist within a community if they compete for the same resource.
Learn more about species here: brainly.com/question/25939248
#SPJ4
Alcohol abuse may be significantly influenced bygenetics
True because supply and demand affect career wages
