“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
The correct answer is option A. The statement, "In mediation, the mediator may propose a solution that includes compromises necessary for the parties to reach an agreement" is True.
Mediation is a non-binding and flexible means of resolving conflicts. The role of the mediator is to help the parties come to a mutually beneficial agreement. Through joint sessions and separate caucuses with the parties, the mediator helps both sides to properly define the issues, understand one another's viewpoints, and move toward resolution.
The mediator works with the parties to help them reach their own resolution. The mediator does not make the final decision; instead, they assist the parties in identifying and concentrating on the crucial issues that must be resolved.
Learn more about mediation here
brainly.com/question/28174486
#SPJ4
This argument is based on "the linguistic relativity hypothesis".
The hypothesis of linguistic relativity holds that the structure of a dialect influences its speakers' reality view or discernment. Prevalently known as the Sapir– Whorf theory, or Whorfianism, the standard is regularly characterized to incorporate two forms. The solid form says that dialect decides thought and that etymological classifications confine and decide intellectual classifications, while the feeble adaptation says that phonetic classifications and use just impact thought and choices.
Answer:
Well first of all, he's said a lot of dumb things. like calling the corona virus the "Kung Flu." because hes xenophobic. He also made it so trans people can be denied health care and no be able to join the military, so now lgbt+ individuals are afraid of losing their rights if he is re-elected. Yet he still has supporters. He is also sexist, and racist. He also called global warming a hoax, which is just scientifcially incorrect. He also didn't wear a mask when he should've, causing him to get the corona virus. Some people make excuses for him, saying things hes said are "out of context," or that he's not that bad. It shouldnt be controversial, he's just a bad president.
Answer:
He reorganized the feudal system to give the aristocracy power.
Explanation:
I am pretty sure this is the answer correct me if I'm wrong though.