Answer:
A
Explanation:
Which <u>do</u><u> </u><u>you</u><u> </u><u>prefer</u><u>,</u> this kind of seminar or computer based training?
<em>Keep</em><em> </em><em>smiling</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>hope</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>satisfied </em><em>with</em><em> </em><em>my</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em>.</em><em>Have</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>good</em><em> </em><em>day</em><em> </em><em>:</em><em>)</em>
Based on the given sentence above, I can say that it is a compound sentence. What makes this sentence compound is that, it consists of two independent clauses and are connected by a coordinating conjunction "so". Therefore, the answer for this would be the last option: two independent clauses.
It should be argument from ignorance because an appeal to logic is not a fallacy, while begging the question is not always a fallacy. Bandwagonning is when you believe something because everyone else believes it.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. question his views.
Explanation:
An unreliable narrator, as the name itself suggests, is a type of narrator whom you cannot trust. This narrator isn't completely sure about what he or she is doing, his own actions, emotions, and thoughts are often erratic; they might say one thing at one point in the story, and then something completely different at another.
We have insight into their mind, and we can see that the thoughts are all jumbled and incoherent. If the narrator is unreliable, it just means they cannot be trusted, which is the case in "Top of the Food Chain" as well.
