Answer:
out of the options given above, the one that supports the significance is B.) It was passed unanimously.
Explanation:
Took the test.
Answer
Jefferson presented his most powerful argument last.
Explanation
The king had refused to protect the American Boarders which severally resulted to destruction of peoples property and life.The declaration of independence was permeable and the declaration explained that the people of America should have rights that are permanent thus they cant be taken away. These rights included the right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.This was the last presented which brought most powerful argument at last
The correct answers are The Fifth and Sixth Amendment
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona was a legal case in 1966, in this, Ernesto Miranda accused of kidnapping and sexual abuse confessed during the interrogation, which led to a sentence of about 20 years. However, Miranda was never told he could have counsel or guidance of a lawyer, he could remain in silence, or his words would be used against him, which means he was not informed of his rights and the legal procedure was not followed. Due to this, the Supreme Court determined the trial and process had not been legal and a retrial was necessary.
Moreover, this decision was related to the fifth amendment that protects against self-incrimination including the right to not answer questions against oneself; as well as, the sixth amendment that establishes a public, speedy and fair trial should be guaranteed. Thus, this case addressed the fifth and sixth amendments.
The correct answer is: "the end of American neutrality in World War II"
The Lend-Lease Act was a program enacted in the US in 1941 to provide support to Allied countries so that they could defeat the axis forces (nazi Germany, fascist Italy and the Japanese Empire) in WWII, but the US had not decided to directly participate in the conflict yet.
The program consisted on the distribution of food, oil, and all types of military materials and it remained functioning since 1941 until the end of the conflict in 1945.
Answer: The Declaration was intended for a wide audience and is written in a more powerful, persuasive style. The Bill of Rights was intended as a legal document while the Declaration carried no legal significance. The Bill of Rights was intended for delegates and lawmakers and is written in a more precise, technical style.
The Bill of Rights was intended as a legal document while the Declaration carried no legal significance.
The Declaration of Independence did not carry any legal significance because it was a mere statement of facts and ideas about America. In this case, nobody could stop America from becoming a country and they needed no approval.
As far as the Bill of Rights, this is a legal document because it was passed by the members of Constitutional Convention who worked together to develop this set of rights. These rights would ensure protection against government tyranny.