The cengage learning for the mitigation is the difference between the agreed upon $72000 less what was earned from the $25000 position that barton managed to obtain
<u>Explanation</u>:
Mitigation of damages:
In the case of barton v. vanhorn a court would consider barton's attempts at findings similar employment a reasonable step in mitigating her damages.
Under the doctrine of damage mitigation, a wrongfully terminated employee must look for other compartable employment, and subtract whatever you make from that job from what you request in damages.
Damages in the case would be the difference between the agreed upon $72000 less what was earned from the $25000 position that barton managed to obtain.
Answer:
a.$65,072.07
b.$100,810.19
c.$110,254.18
d.$111,666.67
Explanation:
a. The value of investment today if payment per year of $6,700 is made for 15 years is given as follows:
Present value today=R[(1-(1+i)^-n)/i]
Where
R=payment to made yearly=$6,700
i=interest per annum=6%
n=number of payments=15
Present value today=6,700[(1-(1+6%)^-15)/6%]=$65,072.07
b. The value of investment today if payment per year of $6,700 is made for 40 years is given as follows:
Present value today=6,700[(1-(1+6%)^-40)/6%]=$100,810.19
c. The value of investment today if payment per year of $6,700 is made for 75 year is given as follows:
Present value today=6,700[(1-(1+6%)^-75)/6%]=$110,254.18
d. The value of investment today if payment per year of $6,700 occurred forever
Present value today=P/i=6,700/6%=$111,666.67
where P=6,700, i=6%
Answer:
$5,055,000
Explanation:
Note: <em>The full question is attached below</em>
<em />
Particulars Amount
Cash $875,000
Accounts receivable $2,695,000
Less: Installments not due in 2021 <u>($600,000)</u> $2,095,000
[$1,200,000 - ($150,000 * 4)]
Inventory <u>$2,085,000</u>
Total of current assets <u>$5,055,000</u>
The obligation of the seller of the receivables to pay the purchaser in case the debtor fails to pay.
Answer:
a. Ada defaults on the note.
Explanation:
An agency can be defined as a mutual relationship existing between two parties, wherein a principal authorizes the agent to act as the principal's representative or on his behalf (fiduciary role) in dealing with third parties.
The parties entering into a contractual agreement are obligated to terminate an agency relationship by placing into the agreement a time period specifying the termination. Thus, when that time elapses or expires, the agency between the parties involved ends. Furthermore, the parties involved may specify the particular purpose for which the agency is established. Once that purpose is achieved, the agency is terminated or ends.
This ultimately implies that, the legal entity or secondary liability (trustee or licensee) would be held responsible for the losses, legal claims and damages incurred by its partner in an agency, whether or not the agent's actions were authorized or unauthorized by the principal.
In this scenario, Ada is the maker of a note, on which Bart is secondarily liable. Also, the current holder of the note is Credit Instruments Company.
Since Bart is secondarily liable to Ada, it will be obligated to pay for any of the notes if Ada defaults on the them.
Hence, a trustee is liable for acts or contracts entered into by an agent when he or she gives an agent either actual authority (power of attorney) or apparent authority.