All categories

3 years ago

The data given below are from the accounting records of the Kuhn Corporation:

Business

1 answer:

charle [14.2K]3 years ago

3 0

The net cash provided by operating activities using the indirect method would be: c. $50,000.

Net Cash From Operating Activities

Net income $45,000

Depreciation expense $9,000

Decrease in accounts payable ($2,500)

Decrease in inventory $3,000

Increase in accounts receivable ($4,500)

Net cash provided by operating activities $50,000

Inconclusion the net cash provided by operating activities using the indirect method would be: c. $50,000.

Learn more about operating activities here:brainly.com/question/25530656

You might be interested in

Dee's has a fixed asset turnover rate of 1.12 and a total asset turnover rate of 0.91. Sam's has a fixed asset turnover rate of

Andreyy89

Answer:

B.utilizing its total assets more efficiently than Sam's

Explanation:

Dee's has a fixed asset turnover rate of 1.12 and a total asset turnover rate of 0.91. Sam's has a fixed asset turnover rate of 1.15 and a total asset turnover rate of 0.88. Both companies have similar operations.

Based on this information, although Sam seems to be utilizing its fixed assets more efficiently, Dee's must be doing utilizing its total assets more efficiently than Sam's

The fixed asset turnover ratio is an efficiency ratio that measures a companies return on their investment in property, plant, and equipment by comparing net sales with fixed assets. In other words, it calculates how efficiently a company is a producing sales with its machines and equipment.

Dee's has a total asset turnover rate of 0.91 compared to a total asset turnover rate of 0.88 by Sam. Hence Dee's efficiency is higher.

5 0

3 years ago

When making replacement decisions, the development of relevant cash flows is complicated when compared to expansion decisions.

fgiga [73]

Answer: True

Explanation:

Decision regarding an asset replacement is usually based on both the internal rate of return and the net present value of the incremental cash flows.

Therefore, it should be noted that this brings about the complications when comparing the development of relevant cash flows to the expansion decisions.

4 0

3 years ago

Can someone please help me with this question!

Dafna1 [17]

Answer:

I think you got it right*

Explanation:

I think this is the same question I took.

6 0

3 years ago

ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the

Ymorist [56]

Answer:

ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the professor explained that the true cost of going to college includes both the tuition I pay as well as something called the "opportunity cost" of going to college. I don't understand. I pay $32,000 per year in tuition. The tuition is what I pay to the school, so it seems like that should be my true cost!

HUBERT: Hi, Eric. Many concepts in economics can be confusing at first. Let's talk it through.

Economists think of costs a bit differently than just the dollar amount that you pay. To an economist, the true cost of college includes the total value of what you give up in order to acquire your college education. In other words, not only did you give up the tuition money that you paid, but by attending college, you gave up opportunities to do other things with your time as well. This is where the idea of opportunity cost comes from.

The opportunity cost of your decision to go to college is the value of the next best alternative that you gave up. Suppose that your next best alternative to college is to work as a cashier. By not going to college, and taking this job, you could earn $16,000 per year. Then your opportunity cost of college is $16,000, and your total cost of a year of college is $48,000 per year.

ERIC: I think I get it now. So when I take into account the opportunity cost of college, the true cost is actually more than just the tuition.

HUBERT: Correct. Thinking about costs in this way will help you make more rational decisions in your everyday life. Now tell me, how can you explain your decision to go to college?

ERIC: I chose to go to college because, for me, the value of a year in college gives me a higher stand and offers me a better long-term opportunity that someone without a college degree.

Explanation:

The question poses a discussion about the opportunity cost of attending college. The understanding behind this is that by choosing to go to college, Eric is forfeiting the opportunity to get a job as a cashier that would earn him $16,000 a year while incurring his college fees of $32,000. Therefore, the total cost of attending college to him should be $48,000.

3 0

3 years ago

Identify the major transportation improvements in this period, and explain how they influenced the market economy.

kramer

In the first half of the nineteenth century, the steamboat, canal, railroad and telegraph were presented. This made transportation a great deal less expensive and quicker for organizations. It additionally connected agriculturists to national markets. The railroad gave employments to such huge numbers of Americans, despite the fact that many were foreigners. Telegraph made it conceivable to impart cross country, in any event quicker than mail would. It was for the most part utilized for organizations. Each of the four of these innovations twisted America out of its monetary past by making exchange/business speedier, less expensive, and more productive.

7 0

3 years ago