Answer:
I can help if you want..
Explanation: So did someone already do this for you or something? If not I can do it. I just want to know if someone answered the question or you just did it. Please lmk.
<span>sweat equity, the patent lawyer is doing for a project or enterprise in the form of effort to work for the ownership interest in a business that will increase in value it is a preferred mode of building equity for entrepreneurs who do have much money in their start-up ventures since they may be unable to provide as much financial capital to their business</span>
Answer:
It improves employee retention and performance motivation.
Explanation:
There are few factors that keep employee motivated and loyal toward organization. The basic factors are career path and monetary benefits that keep the energy flow in the employee.
A formal succession plan is a human resource management strategy for identifying the potential successor, it reduces the confusion for the organization and employee in the method of hiring and promotion. These strategies also keep an employee motivated, improve performance and retention in the organization as they find growth and security in the organization.
Answer:
Please refer the detail answer below
Explanation:
Store to Manufacturer ------ Request delivery schedule
Buyer to Manufacturer ------- Frequent, direct reorder
Manufacturer to Distribution Center and Buyer ------ Advanced shipping notice
Store to Distribution Center ----- Corporate inventory order
Customer to Store ----- Smart TV purchased
Store to Buyer ------ POS terminal sends data
Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.
