The north benefited from cotton because when they had built a cotton gin that cotton gin produced a wide spread of cotton to make a great deal of labor but also made the plantation owners use there enslaved people for that task, so without the introduction of cotton gins its possible that slavery would have follows a different course, Im hoping I answers in a way that it is right you
The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
- Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
- If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.
Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.
In conclusion, option c is correct.
Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.
Answer:
The people who did not begin and end each day in shades of gray"
And
world of color-reds,blues and strolling down the street.
Explanation:
The people who did not begin and end each day in shades of gray. It was active and brimming with activity.
Answer:
negotiate a treaty with the Iroquois.
Explanation:
Malign might be a good synonym for take away in social studies
