In 1925 Clarence Darrow defended John Scopes who was charged with teaching his students about evolution which broke Tennessee law.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "conquering Norse-held lands of Sweden and Denmark." The choice that was not a primary concern of Charlemagne is that of <span>conquering Norse-held lands of Sweden and Denmark</span>
Answer:
We can list as similarities between these two empires their location, the way how they built their cities, and the period they build their empires. The differences, however, are more visible. For the differences, we can separate into two points: the government and the war practices.
Explanation:
The Babylonians were harsh with their laws. An example of this point is the Code of Hammurabi. Dated from around the year 1700 BC, this law agreement was based on the lex talionis, or "Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth". The violence of these laws is one of the main differences between Babylonians and Hittites.
The Hittites Law Code was more complex and consistent. This is because of their nomadism, and especially because they had the precept to capture their enemies. So, their laws must be range. We can name their laws based on the concept of causes, which means, your actions would be punished according to their strength. However, there was no death penalty (capital punishment), and many of the crimes were solved trough tax payments or fines.
When it comes to war, the Babylonians were not used to combat. Even if they had an army and the pretense idea of expansion, they were closer to the research and scholar world. Many astronomical discoveries were proceeded by the Babylonians. On the other hand, Hittites were warriors.
It’s A: Locke Explanation:I learned about dude every year since 5th grade
Conservation should be given to smaller units to protect them from competition and provide more employment opportunities. Bigger firms should not be given protection.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The conservation which is important for the economy is the conservation given to the industries and the manufacturing units which are at smaller level to give employment opportunities to the people of the economy and protect them from competition.
But the conservation and protection to bigger firms should not be given, these should be exposed to competition so that they work in more efficient way and provide more choices to the people in the market.