The correct answer is C. Denied citizenship rights to blacks
Explanation:
Historically, Northerners opposed slavery, which was a common practice in the Southern states. In this context, northerners believed slavers should be freed and they should be given civil rights. Due to this, when Dred Scott, a black slave, tried to sue his master to obtain freedom as he had been in a "free" territory, and the Supreme Court determined rights from the Constitution did not protect black people (including the right to sue) most northerners were angry. This means the Dredd Scott decision angered northerners because it showed during that time black citizens did not have any rights and were not protected by the Constitution (option C).
The Supremacy Clause (Article 6, Clause two) declares that the Constitution is the "supreme law of the land". It establishes that federal laws rule over state laws. This ensures that there will be no disagreement between the state and the national government over who has more authority. Federalism is a system of government where the power is shared between the state and national government, but this does not mean that they are equal. The national government will be "supreme".
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The Enlightenment was a period in the history of western Europe, where philosophers and thinkers questioned religious ideas of the Middle Ages and traditional political forms, bringing new concepts about society and politics. They also considered that humans could advance through the use of reason.
The Enlightenment influenced founders its ideas of liberty and rights for the people. Famous thinkers such as Montesquiou, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean -Jaques Rosseau influenced later independence movements as was the case for the American Revolutionary War and the French Revolution.
So the founding fathers of the United States such as Roger Sherman, Benjamin Franklin, or Thomas Jefferson, took ideas from the Enlightenment that were included in the Declaration of Independence, and later, in the Constitution of the United States.
Maybe, depends on the law.
Since you provide no options, That could be considered an economic Benefit. Using require materials will lead to using less money for the expenditure, which later on could be allocated to fund a more important/pressing matter such as welfare.
hope this helps
