Answer:
The Constitution explicitly assigns the president the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors.
Explanation:
During the Civil War, African Americans in the North <u>B. </u><u>fought </u><u>in s</u><u>egregated regiments.</u>
During the Civil War:
- African Americans were not initially allowed to join the Union armies.
- African Americans eventually enrolled in the war but were in segregated units.
These segregated units were commanded by White officers as the Union did not want to commission any Black officers. These units fought bravely and earned much praise.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
<em>Find out more on the </em><em>African Americans </em><em>in the</em><em> Civil War </em><em>at brainly.com/question/13066300. </em>
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
The Native Americans lived a life that was a complete opposite from the way that the Euroeans were accustomed to.
They believed that the land was shared by everyone and not one person could own it.
The Native Americans also had a polytheistic religion which completely went agains the beliefs of the colonists.
Colonists viewed the Native Americans as savages and barbarians because their ways of living were different. The Native Americans believed that man is ruled by respect and reverence for nature and that nature is an all and must be respected.
Upon arrival to the new world, the European Americans adhered to a governmental monarchy, yet the Native Americans geld to a tribal form of government. These structures were ingrained into each society so that the very practice was one of deep cultural practice.
The Europeans believe in an absolute commitment to the crown of England.
However, the native americans devoted themselves to ecah and another and had no central ruler. Nonetheless, they did have many chiefs among the tribal chiefdoms that regulated relations among the tribal members.
This diferences betwen cultures causes frequent clashes that often led to destruction of land and peole.
Summarizing: The most important differences were:
- The way in which society was structured.
- They religious beliefs.
- They economy system.
