He must read the suspect his rights
<u>Answer:</u>
This case was not meant to be a precedent and It was decided in a 5–4 vote.
Option: (A) and (B)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The Bush v/s Gore case of 2000 was unusual because the Supreme Court decision in the case ordering the initial count to be considered as final brought a wave of mixed responses throughout the United States.
- The decision was voted 5-4 by the Supreme Court bench of 9 justices hearing the case.
- The critics interpreted from the judgment issued that the case was not meant to be taken as a precedent for any cases in the future.
Answer:
The investigator should discuss the pros and cons of both the investigational drugs and the drugs that are commercially available drug and then allow the subject so that he can decide whether to withdraw form the ongoing research to take the new drug.
Explanation:
When the 46-year man enrolled in the Phase III study of the drug. When the research was going on a new drug became available in the market in that case the investigators should discuss the benefits and the drawbacks of the investigational drug and the other drug that is commercially available then let the subject decide whether to keep on the research or not.
Answer:
The answer is "The wife and the children will get the land
".
Explanation:
According to the laws of intestacy when the person dies without the need of a valid will, his or her property moves on to heirs through state law through what is called "unstate succession", throughout the question "The wife and the children will get the land " Because when Cyril has left behind a wife and children, but also not a would, the farming is handed over to them following their inheritance rules.
