Answer: Colin's evidence is not relevant to his claim<u> because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.</u>
Explanation: Colin's evidence is not related to his main claim, that is to say the assertion that drones do not invade people's privacy<u>. Instead of focusing on providing evidence that supports the idea that drones do not affect people's privacy negatively, Colin offers evidence related to the thought that flying drones is a sport </u>by stating that coordination and technical skills are necessary to fly drones. Therefore, it can be said that his argument lacks strength because it has not been properly supported.
<span>Even though you didn’t give any options, I can help you. While reading ‘’the Raven’’ you always come on phrase ‘’nevermore’’ (as everybody knows it is the only word he knows) replied by the Raven. The repetition of this word is actually the main point that creates a unity of effect of longing <span>in the poem which reveals the sadness and despair that author wanted to bring to the reader by repeating.</span></span>
Answer:
The nature of the personal conflict between John Proctor and Elizabeth Proctor was exacerbated by the infidelity between John and Abigail. No woman has ever liked sharing her husband with another woman. Men also hated sharing their wives with other men, but they indulge in this evil, all the same.
Their argument of whether to present the illicit affair before the court in order to determine the witchcraft accusations being peddled by Abigail Williams against Elizabeth Proctor further heightened the action of the play.
Explanation:
Arthur Miller's 1953 play, titled "The Crucible," was written to chronicle the events that led to the witchcraft trial. The play's events corresponded to the events that actually occurred in Salem, Massachusetts during 1692. According to Arthur Miller, the main idea behind "The Crucible" was to criticize McCarthyism or the practice of making accusations without sufficient evidence. The play wanted to encourage people to stop jumping to the worst conclusions, especially when they lacked substantial evidence.
Answer:
injustice, anger, anxiety
