Answer:
D) The Soviet economy was a tremendous success story; the USSR would still be together if it were not for the ethnic differences.
Explanation:
The Soviet economy was not a tremendous success, in fact, it was in many aspects a failure (although it was a success in some fields).
The other 3, true statements in the question give us a clue why:
The Soviet system benefited the center (Russia) disproportionally, leaving aside the other, peripheral republics in Central Asia, the Caucasus, The Baltics, and Eastern Europe, which were often very poor.
The Soviet system used a planned economy, instead of a market economy, and this led to many errors in the production of goods and services. Resources were often poured in unprofitable industries over more profitable ones, and the geographical location of the economic sectors often did not make sense.
Things that in a market system would likely not happen, ocurred in the soviet planned economy because the planners did not realize their mistakes.
Answer:
<h3>both Jan and Duncan are liable on the contract for the purchase of land.
</h3>
Explanation:
- A contract can be signed by an agent on behalf of an authority if the intended nature of the contract remain the same.
- This type of contract signing usually takes in the corporate sector where the head of a firm may hire an agent to sign contracts on behalf of the firm.
- When contracts are signed by an agent on behalf of the employer, both the agent and the employer becomes liable to the contract as agents represent the principal/employer.
The effect that is described as discrepancy between candidates' high poll ratings and election performance, caused by supporters' assumption that an easy win means they need not turn out is called BOOMERANG EFFECT.
The correct answer is The couple moves out to a non-community property state.
Explanation: Among these options this would be the only one that would result in an end of status, as they would be moving to another community where the system is not the same as it is now.
