The most slaves live in Missouri and Texas. In Missouri, as in the various slave states, monetary conditions decided the quantity of slaves in a given region. Since Missouri was to a great extent horticultural, most slaves were utilized in the fruitful base grounds which flanked the Mississippi and Missouri waterways and their tributaries. Without a solitary staple yield, Missouri never grew huge ranches as did the cotton states.
5th to the 15th century<span>.</span>
No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>
</span>
