All categories

3 years ago

How many method(s) of distributing goods and services can satisfy all wants.?

2 answers:

5 0

The answer to the question above is NONE, there is no method(s) of distributing goods and services that satisfies all wants of the people. Wants are in constants change and infinite due to change of demands. Satisfaction of human wants are limited to the amount of natural and human resources availability.

Rom4ik [11]3 years ago

5 0

Answer: NONE

Explanation: human wants are infinite and are limited to the amount of natural and human resources availability.

You might be interested in

In case of an emergency, once you or someone already on the scene has contacted 9-1-1, the next thing to do is: A) Move them to

Lostsunrise [7]

D check for a heartbeat

4 0

3 years ago

Roberto Designers was organized on January 1, 2018. The firm was authorized to issue 140,000 shares of $5 par value common stock

Phoenix [80]

Answer:

The total stockholder's equity at the end of the year will be $352,000.

Explanation:

The issue of common stock at $7/share= 14,000*$7=$98,000

The issue of common stock at $8/share= 28,000*$8=$224,000

The net income is $140,000.

The dividends paid= $70,000.

Purchase of treasury stock= 4000*$10=$40,000

The total stockholder's equity

=The issue of common stock at $7/share+The issue of common stock at $8/share+The net income-The dividends paid-Purchase of treasury stock

=$98,000+$224,000+$140,000- $70,000-$40,000

=$352,000.

7 0

3 years ago

Recall the text’s definition of diminishing marginal utility: "the common pattern that each marginal unit of a good consumed pro

son4ous [18]

Explanation:

Note, the term diminishing marginal utility refers to an economic principle that states that the more unit of a particular commodity or service we consume, the more the satisfaction (utility) derived out of the consumption reduces or diminishes.

For instance, if I watched movies produced by a particular entertainment company for several days (eg Disney Studios), I may become dissatisfied using this particular entertainment provider and may decide to try another service (Netflix).

Another instance could occur after exercising, I'm given 3 bottles of coke, after taking my first bottle, the amount of utility I derive would reduce until I get to the third bottle, at this point I've reached my peak.

The law of diminishing marginal utility failed for someone I know who had used the same type of toothpaste and brushed her teeth at least once a day for a period of over 10 years.

6 0

3 years ago

Opportunity costs at a manufacturing company are not part of manufacturing overhead. True or false?.

Bess [88]

It is true that Opportunity costs at a manufacturing company are not part of manufacturing overhead.

<h3>What is Opportunity costs ?</h3>

Opportunity costs can be described as the term that represent the potential benefits which individual, investor, misses out in the process of choosing one alternative over another.

Because opportunity costs are unseen can be easily overlooked, therefore, in this case, It is true that Opportunity costs at a manufacturing company are not part of manufacturing overhead.

Learn more on Opportunity costs at:

brainly.com/question/1549591

#SPJ1

6 0

1 year ago

For each of the following scenarios, begin by assuming that all demand factors are set to their original values and Peacock is c

Elden [556K]

Solution and Explanation:

For every one of the accompanying situations, start by expecting that all interest factors are set to their unique qualities and Peacock is charging $300 per room every night.

1) If the normal family unit pays increments by 20%, from $50,000 to $60,000 every year, the amount of rooms requested at the Peacock ascends from 200 rooms every night to 250 rooms every night. Accordingly, the pay flexibility of interest is certain, implying that lodgings at the Peacock are ordinary products.

Explanation: Income elasticity of demand = 25% divide by 20% = 1.3

At the point when raise in salary prompts an expansion in the amount requested (or a fall in pay prompts a fall in the amount requested), the great is known as an ordinary decent.

2) In the event that the cost of an aircraft ticket from JFK to LAS was to increment by 10%, from $200 to $220 roundtrip, while all other interest factors stay at their underlying qualities, the amount of rooms requested at the Peacock tumbles from 200 rooms for every night to 150 rooms for each night. Since the cross-value versatility of interest is negative, lodgings at the Peacock and aircraft trips among JFK and LAS are supplements.

Explanation: Cross elasticity of demand = -25% divide by 10% = -2.5

Two merchandise ordered supplements when a raise the cost of one great abatement the amount requested of the other or when a fall in the cost of one great expands the amount requested of the other.

3) Peacock is discussing diminishing the cost of its rooms to $275 every night. Under the underlying interest conditions, you can see this would make its all-out income increment. Diminishing the cost will consistently have this impact on income when Peacock is working on the flexible part of its interest bend.

Explanation: Total revenue = $300 per room per night multiply with 200 rooms = $60,000 per night

By bringing down its cost to $275, Triple Sevens can occupy 225 rooms. In such situation, all-out income is $275 per room every night multiply 225 rooms = $61,875 every night

At the point when the request is versatile, the rate change in cost is littler than the rate change in an amount as the purchasers are exceptionally delicate to changes in cost.

8 0

3 years ago