1. Why did the news of the Emancipation Proclamation not have effect the slaves in Texas?

History

2 answers:

Mariana [72]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

the Mississippi River was taken over by the union so no news could get to Texas since Texas was practically isolated

Explanation:

-Dominant- [34]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

slavery had technically been abolished two years earlier by Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, which covered the Confederate states. As Union troops retook territory, they emancipated enslaved people living there. And the orders issued on Juneteenth applied only to Texas. Slavery didn’t end in states like Kentucky and Delaware, which hadn’t seceded and therefore weren’t covered by Lincoln’s proclamation, until Dec. 18, 1865, when the 13th Amendment was adopted.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Pleaseeeeee helppppppp meeeee!

Mkey [24]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

As economic theories, socialism and communism sought to

nika2105 [10]

It's b is in baby............

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A summary should include

Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

I think its the third one

Explanation: hope this helps

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Portuguese could not hold on to the claims in Southeast Asia because they did

Tanzania [10]

Answer:

The answer to you're question is true. They were pushed out by the East India Company.

6 0

3 years ago

How did most Cherokee respond to the Treaty of New Echota?

svetoff [14.1K]

The answer is B. Most Cherokee found the treaty fraudulent, and the Cherokee National Council voted to reject it in 1836. People against the treaty submitted a petition, lead by Chief John Ross, to urge Congress to void the treaty.

5 0

3 years ago